Sections
Home » YES! Blogs » David Korten » Living Economies: Learning from the Biosphere

Living Economies: Learning from the Biosphere

How we humans can redesign our failing systems by turning back to nature—and learning to live by the rules of life.

This is the seventeenth of a series of blogs based on excerpts adapted from the 2nd edition of Agenda for a New Economy: From Phantom Wealth to Real Wealth. I wrote Agenda to spur a national conversation on economic policy issues and options that are otherwise largely ignored. This blog series is intended to contribute to that conversation. —DK


Baby Turtle, photo by ippei naoi

Photo by ippei naoi.

My favorite definition of life comes from evolutionary biologist Lynn Margulies: “Life is matter with the capacity to choose.”

The intricate self-organizing structure of Earth’s biosphere is the product of life’s extraordinary 3.5 billion year evolutionary quest to explore and expand the possibilities of its capacity to choose. The result is a complex and highly sophisticated fractal structure of nested, self-reliant, progressively smaller-scale ecosystems, each exquisitely adapted to its particular place on Earth to optimize the capture of energy to sustain matter in a living choice-making state.

To this end, trillions upon trillions of cells, organisms, and communities of organisms engage in an exquisite continuing dance of cooperative exchange. Each participant in this dance maintains its own identity and vitality while contributing to the needs of its neighbors and to the balance, stability, and resilience of the whole.

We must now step to a new level of species maturity and learn to live by life’s rules.

We humans, with our extraordinary capacity for choice, are a product of this wondrous process. In our species' immaturity, however, our dominant cultures have forgotten that our individual and collective well-being depends on the well-being of the whole. We must now step to a new level of species maturity, redesign the culture and institutions of our economic system to mimic the structure and dynamics of the biosphere, and learn to live by life’s rules. It is an epic test of our human capacity for learning, creative innovation, self-organization, and individual and collective choice. 

The following are three defining characteristics of the living systems our human economies must emulate.

  1. Cooperative Self-Organization: Ecosystems have no central control structure. Their health and vitality depend on processes of cooperative self-organization in which each species learns to meet its own needs in ways that simultaneously serve the needs of others. The more diverse and cooperative the bio-community, the greater its capacity to innovate and the greater its resilience in the face of crisis.
  2. Self-Reliant Local Adaptation: The biosphere’s cooperatively self-organizing fractal structure supports a constant process of adaptation to the intricate features of Earth’s distinctive local microenvironments to optimize the capture, sharing, use, and storage of available energy.

    Local self-reliance
    is a key to the system’s ability to absorb and contain most system disturbance locally with minimum overall system disruption. So long as each local subsystem balances its consumption and reproduction with local resource availability, the biosphere remains healthy and dynamic.
  3. Managed Boundaries: Because of the way life manages energy, each living entity must maintain an active flow of energy within itself and in continuous exchange with its neighbors. Life requires permeable managed membranes at every level of organization—the cell, the organ, the multi-celled organism, and the multi-species ecosystem—to manage these flows and as a defense against parasitic predators.

    If the membrane of the cell or organism is breached, the continuously flowing embodied energy that sustains its living internal structures dissipates into the surrounding environment, and it dies. It also dies, however, if the membrane becomes impermeable, thus isolating the entity and cutting off its needed energy exchange with its neighbors. Managed boundaries are not only essential to life’s good health; they are essential to its very existence.

Grimey's Music, photo by Kelly StewartA New Deal for Local Economies
More local, durable economies are already taking root. How can we can help them along?

These are foundational design principles for the cooperative, self-organizing, self-reliant adaptive living economies on which our human future depends. The institutional structures of living economies facilitate joyful non-monetized exchanges of life energy based on relationships of trust and caring—the social capital of vital cohesive living communities.

Reorganizing our human economies to function as locally self-reliant subsystems of our local ecosystems will require segmenting the borderless global economy into a planetary system of interlinked self-reliant regional economies. This does not mean shutting out the world. Vital living economies exchange their surplus goods for the surplus goods of their neighbors and freely share ideas, technology, and culture in a spirit of mutual respect for the needs and values of all players.

In a living economy, the rights and interests of living communities of living, breathing people engaged in a living exchange with the natural systems of their bioregion properly take priority over the presumed rights of artificial corporate entities that value life only as a marketable commodity and operate by the moral code of a malignant cancer. Protecting the boundaries of the community from intrusion by predatory corporations is an essential function of any responsible government.

We humans are the most advanced expression of life’s capacity to choose. We must now demonstrate our ability to use that capacity wisely.


David Korten author picDavid Korten (livingeconomiesforum.org) is the author of Agenda for a New Economy, TheGreat Turning: From Empire to Earth Community, and the international best seller When Corporations Rule the World. He is board chair of YES! Magazine and co-chair of the New Economy Working Group. This Agenda for a New Economy blog series is co-sponsored by CSRwire.com and YesMagazine.org based on excerpts from Agenda for a New Economy, 2nd edition.

The ideas presented here are developed in greater detail in Agenda for a New Economy available from theYES! Magazine web store — where there are 3 WAYS TO GET THE BOOK and a 22% discount!

Interested?

3 WAYS TO GET THE BOOK with a 22% discount


 

More by David Korten:

  • The World of Our Dreams
    Our world is made up of diverse populations—but really we all want the same things out of life. It's time we put our common dreams into action.
  • Our Human Nature
    People often justify greed as simply human nature. Why our economic policies need to reward our caring, cooperative sides instead.
  • The End of Empire
    Wall Street’s days are numbered. Ours need not be.
YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Korten, D. (2011, April 25). Living Economies: Learning from the Biosphere. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/blogs/david-korten/learning-from-the-biosphere. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

New Economy and popular culture

Posted by Roxanne Peterson at May 02, 2011 01:20 PM
All of David Korten's ideas are essential for creating a mindset that will begin to grasp the enormity of our current economic, political, envirnomental and cultural situation. But we need some type of approach that is easily accessible to the average alienated person; something that will more directly appeal to popular culture and inspire people's creativity and excitement about creating change in society.

Remember the 60's? What can we learn in retrospect about that cultural movement? There was a real opening there to change things on a monumental level in our culture, but it didn't happen through research and evaluation, and not through businesses and local govenments working from the "top" down. That was a unique time in history, but what elements of that cultural revolution can we draw upon to help us now?

If the goal is to create genuine systmeic change, we need to create a more grounded cultural movement that appeals to people on a gut level first (while still being about the broader issues). The outcome needs to be a critical mass of people moving in the same direction rather than small groups working mainly in isolation. Let's start THAT conversation - how to make it fun and accessible for ALL people regardless of their economic stability, position, or resources. The Common Security Clubs are an attempt at that, but already they are becoming too fragmented and isolated in their approach it seems. We need something exciting and fun like the 60's for people to cohere around, or else it becomes mainly an exercise on focusing on problems with very little systemic change to show for all the time and effort required (and face it, it's not readily accessible to all people).

At this rate, it will take many decades to make progress. Also, the more we become "informed" through various media outlets, the more we become overwhelmed and tune things out. Anyone in the least bit politically inclined is already inundated through mulitple media with too many related causes and efforts to generate much excitement about anything in particular. We become more and more disconnected from the culture at large. Information is great, but what is the larger context we can create around it to generate excitement and connectivity?

Simple Solution

Posted by Robin Schulte at May 11, 2011 12:42 PM
I like your perspective, Roxanne, we really do need something inspiring to unite humanity toward solving its problems. I think the answer lies in one of David Korten's main ideas; that dynamic spheres of localized cooperation between humans and their environment are necessary to create an adaptable, flexible, and creative global society that will live and let live. To do this there should be a return to the idea of local community centers. Throughout history there's always been a center of town or community that represents the cooperation within the community and the common ground shared by all. With the current communication and transportation networks throughout the world this center of community has been seemingly outdated. However, what if those community centers were actually able to solve life's basic needs of food, shelter and community, or go beyond that to provide energy and even luxuries? Unfortunately, the only way I see this to be possible is if it's easy, simple and doesn't take a lot of time. Fortunately, it is. In this age of innovation, riding on the shoulders of the giants of history, we have the ability to build technologically simple structures that, combined with minimal understanding of cooperation within ecosystems, can provide for all the food, shelter and community that a small society living within a global society needs, for only a couple hours of work a day. Modern, clean energy technology provides luxuries that minimally impact the environment, if at all. We have all the proven technology of the past and the exciting, cutting edge, technology of today, and with just a simple, careful selection from each we can solve the resource war, which is responsible for a great percentage of crimes. Imagine if each town center had a large, geodesic dome, housing an aquaponics system that could provide most, if not all, of the food for the town, and all it would take is an hour or so a day from each citizen to maintain it? Perhaps after easy labor in the gardens there would be a gathering nearby to celebrate the latest art, music, science, philosophy, or extension of human potential there is to offer, or citizens might retire to private domes/houses to relax or work on their next inspiration. Instead of large corporations that expand to meet markets that they create through advertising, there would be a return to the basic foundational needs of society, and an efficiency of modern and proven technology, to allow humanity something it may never have had in its impressively long existence: a moment to think, and to get outside the historically necessary battle with nature to realize we can be caretakers of it instead of its adversary. We are conditioned to control nature in order to survive, but perhaps the best way to survive is to adapt to nature's way, through technology and bio-mimicry, in a cooperative, dynamic and SIMPLE manner. Realistically all we need is food, water, shelter, a stable environment and each other. These things are incredibly simple to manifest if we all expend just a little effort toward doing so. The majority of effort expended is really just in making our lives fun and interesting and maximizing human potential on top of this basic, simple infrastructure. This is where community/town centers come into play, providing a shared experience where people can experiment and learn what they don't know they don't know. If everyone has what they need to live, then the economy and currency of the future is ideas, experience and knowledge. It truly is the information age. The simple solution I'm working toward at the moment is to create a network of these community centers that act locally and but perceive globally. To do this I volunteer for a non-profit called The Root Center that is attempting to solve the basic needs of humanity in order of immediacy. Let me know if you'd like to help. http://www.therootcenter.org

re: simple solution

Posted by Roxanne Peterson at May 14, 2011 08:59 PM
Wow, this sounds so interesting; I will explore it further. I'm wondering how it could really be feasible on such a large scale as you suggest though - solving all basic needs such as food and shelter. That would have to be a huge community center. I guess if you started out in very small communities where there is ample space available and everyone embraces the concept, it would be doable. Simple and dynamic, combining the best modern technology with traditional wisdom. And the arts and music is a key aspect for sure.

Now, how can those principles be brought to larger urban areas - and brought to scale in the next decade or so? Even small urban areas, such as where I live, seem light years away from that approach.

Urban Farming

Posted by Robin Schulte at May 16, 2011 04:16 PM
Urban settings can be more challenging, but certainly doable. There's a giant hydroponics operation going on inside a gutted out building in Chicago, for example, but more likely rooftop gardens would be best in such a setting. I'm sure even smaller balcony gardens, etc. would be a help. All you really need is a 60' X 60' space for an aquaponics dome next to a building that has a venue, etc. for the community side of things, or you could even build a dome on a rooftop! The important thing is that local communities provide local solutions. The number of community centers to cover the country would be determined by the size of each center.

Biodiversity

Posted by JC Scott at May 02, 2011 01:20 PM
I am reading Agenda now and it fits what we are trying to do with our business in Victoria. David's writings are a beacon to a more hopeful direction and I can only hope that reason starts to prevail over greed before it is too late. The life and death aspect of our economy and the environment seem to miss most people. This short article is a good metaphor for that challenge.

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools