Sections
Home » YES! Blogs » David Korten » End the Fed? David Korten Responds

End the Fed? David Korten Responds

There’s lots of anger against the Federal Reserve from the left and the right. David Korten argues that what it needs is some major restructuring.

Wednesday, November 9, was Occupy Wall Street Federal Reserve Awareness Day. The day’s events included an interview with David Korten for occupywallst.org and occupiedwallstjournal.com by Harrison Schultz, an occupy organizer. This blog provides a context for the interview.


 Listen to the interview

I don’t normally agree with Congressman Ron Paul, but his claim on MSNBC in December 2009 that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke is more powerful than President Obama has substantial merit. As Paul went on to explain “He [Bernanke] can create a trillion dollars in secret without any monitoring of the Congress.”

We now know that Paul understated Bernanke’s power by $15 trillion.

There are angry calls from both left and right to shut down the Fed. The anger is justified, [but] ignores the reality that a national money/banking system requires oversight and management.

The Dodd-Frank financial reform bill signed into law by President Obama on July 21, 2010 included a mandate for a one-time Government Accountability Office audit of the emergency lending facility the U.S. Federal Reserve established in response to the 2008 Wall Street financial crash. The audit revealed that the Fed had secretly made $16 trillion in financial commitments to a long list of the world’s largest financial institutions and corporations, many based in other countries. It was all done entirely in secret, at the Fed’s own discretion, and based on nothing more than computer key strokes.

End the Fed, photo by r0b0r0b

Photo by r0b0r0b

No Congressional authorization was required. Nor was the Fed required even to inform Congress, the administration, or the public.

Now that is real power, beyond the wildest dreams of any U.S. president—and totally contrary to the basic principles of democracy or a market economy.

To put $16 trillion in perspective, we can compare it to the U.S. GDP ($14 trillion), the total U.S. debt accumulated over our 200+ year history ($14.5 trillion), the federal budget ($3.5 trillion), or the amount the Congressional Supercommittee is charged with eliminating from the federal deficit ($1.5 trillion).

The U.S. Federal Reserve System [the Fed’s primary functions are carried out by a system of 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks] is a study in obfuscation. It appears in the organization chart of the U.S. government and presents itself to the world as an independent government body, but its highly complex governance structure assures its operations are in fact controlled by the big banks whose interests it faithfully serves. It piously reports that its accounts are subject to extensive internal and external audit, but only the special one-time audit ordered by the U.S. Congress in the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill signed into law by President Obama on July 21, 2010 under vigorous Fed protest revealed the amount and the beneficiaries of its $16 trillion post-crash handouts.

There are angry calls from both left and right to shut down the Fed. The anger is justified. The call to shut it down, however, ignores the reality that a national money/banking system requires oversight and management by a central bank or its institutional equivalent. The choices center on that institution’s degree of transparency, to whom it will be accountable, and what its priorities will be.

The Federal Reserve System under Allan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke has used its power to maximize Wall Street profits by suppressing wages, inflating financial bubbles, facilitating predatory financial games that should be illegal, and bailing out the losers—all behind a veil of strict secrecy. It can and should be restructured to be transparent and publicly accountable for using its power to support full employment and maintain stable asset valuations.

The Fed needs to be entirely restructured as one element of a needed restructuring of our entire system of money/banking/finance to create a system of community rooted and accountable financial institutions that function as well-regulated public utilities to fund productive investment and home ownership.


David Korten author picDavid Korten is board chair of YES! Magazine and the author of Agenda for a New EconomyTheGreat Turning: From Empire to Earth Community, and the international bestseller When Corporations Rule the World. He is co-chair of the New Economy Working Group, and a founding board member of the Business Alliance for Local Living Economies.

 Interested?

  • Click here for YES! Magazine's ongoing coverage of Occupy Wall Street.
  • How You Can Get Started Building a New Economy
    Change the story; create a new reality; change the rules. David Korten’s threefold strategy for change.
  • How to Liberate America
    How is it that our nation is awash in money, but too broke to provide jobs and services? David Korten introduces a landmark new report, “How to Liberate America from Wall Street Rule.”
YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Korten, D. (2011, November 17). End the Fed? David Korten Responds. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/blogs/david-korten/now-that-is-real-power. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

Euthanize the Fed

Posted by PJ Jones at Nov 27, 2011 01:52 AM
Why on earth would we want to save the Federal Reserve?
The Primary Owners of the Federal Reserve Bank Are:

1. Rothschild's of London and Berlin

2. Lazard Brothers of Paris

3. Israel Moses Seaf of Italy

4. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York

5. Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany

6. Lehman Brothers of New York

7. Goldman, Sachs of New York

8. Rockefeller Brothers of New York

All the primary owners are branches of European establishments. Foreigners control the United States Money supply. They literally own exclusive rights to the dollar and simply enter dollars into their banks books to make money which they then lend back to us at a profit. For them money is simply a data entry into their account: its created out of thin air. Clearly the private ownership of the U.S. Dollar is by far The Greatest Crime of the Century. The owners of this bank have been responsible for instigating all the major wars and depressions in the last 100 years. They own the bank, they own the dollar and they own all the major media channels, the military industrial complex and most politicians, judges and cops.

Sometimes the bank pays an arbitrary 'franchise fee' to the U.S. government to keep the politicians paid off. "

http://folsomtelegraph.com/detail/102334.html

END the WARS.
END the FED.

Fed as "Public Utility"

Posted by Steve Seuser at Nov 27, 2011 07:40 AM
I generally support the concepts in this post, but I'm left wondering if public utility status is actually adequate for our country's central bank. In my experience public utilities occupy a monopoly role within markets and use their monopoly power to extract profits and increase control over their markets and consumers. I don't know of many government agencies that have managed to effectively regulate their public utilities.

Given public utilities' proclivity to manipulating their regulators, why would we not make the most central financial institution in our economy, The Federal Reserve, a publicly owned entity, similar to the Bank of North Dakota (a state-owned bank) except on a national scale? The Fed's profits would flow into public coffers, and there would be no need to continue making interest payments on the national debt.

Who is to Oversee the expanded Public Utilities?

Posted by PiscesCurveUS at Nov 28, 2011 03:22 AM
Steve Seuser wrote: "In my experience public utilities occupy a monopoly role within markets and use their monopoly power to extract profits and increase control over their markets and consumers."

I think Mr. Seuser brings up a good point. But are the 'public utilities' that he mentions fully transparent/auditable? And if they are, does anybody in 'the media' take notice? Transparency in the Public Sector is a valid- and often-advocated- path. But reliance upon the concept/practice sometimes 'begs the question', or assumes, that ‘the media’ cares enough about a public interest issue to provide some worthwhile coverage.

This in turn leads to the question of whether 'the medias' watchdog role is better served by "public" or "private" media institutions [some might be tempted to say neither, seeing as how we public-spirited citizens have mostly had to rely on small-fry/'independent' websites for revelations of all but the most extreme/late-stage examples of public malfeasance].

This, for me at least, also relates to a key reform issue of whether the world's current dominant practice of Fractional Reserve Lending (FRL) contributes to a lack of media independence in regards to honest, fair, and courageous/incisive reporting of public business to the public at large. Does FRL compromise our public media- the institutional EARS of our society... as does a lien against a house? Is there anyway around this 'inherent' conundrum or conflict of interest as long as we stick with the (3 or 4 centuries old) Money-as-Debt/FRL system?

Mr. Korten's "Liberate America Plan" doesn't address the FRL/Money-as-Debt issue. Is it possible for us to know if the LAP has really thought through this issue- as opposed to just ignoring it or presuming it as a given? After all, even the Canadian, the 'nationalized' Bank of England, and contemporary Chinese systems all still rely on the central/assumed concept of FRL and 'money as debt'. Are LAP and other Public Banking reforms copying from the plans of other nations today without acknowledging it?

What is the relation of FRL to (what has been called the) corp. media cartel’?

What effect would the LAP have upon the appalling failure of both ‘Private’ and ‘Public’ big-media under the current FRL/debt-money system?

How does FRL effect: 1) media control/ownership; and how does media control/ownership, in turn, effect
2) public interest/public watchdog-type reporting?

Steve Seuser wrote: "I don't know of many government agencies that have managed to effectively regulate their public utilities."

Would this (real) PROBLEM be attributed more to Gov’t (de jure) INEPTITUDE & lack of interest; or because of Media (‘public’ or ‘private’) (de facto) UNWILLINGNESS to take such matters seriously?
If the currency (blood/heart) of society should be Public Utility, then what about the Ears of society?

I think we need to know more about how (and by how much) does the practice of FRL distort the hearing of a society.

Fractional Reserve Lending

Posted by Steve Seuser at Nov 28, 2011 09:33 AM
I agree the issue of fractional reserve lending needs to be on the table too. It seems easier to contemplate if the entity that controls the money supply represents that common good. If we were to move away from fractional reserve lending, we'd need to establish a system that regulates the money supply in a new way, and uses these new dollars in some fairly allocated way across geographic areas, and presumably also addresses our collective economic and social goals.

GDPworship- powerd by Fractional Reserve Lending

Posted by PiscesCurveUS at Dec 01, 2011 02:16 AM
As opposed to today's Goldman Sachs-JP Morgan status quo, a US "Monetary Authority" Board (for example) could be comprised of 1 or 2 elected reps. from each of the fifty states [with no more than 8 reps. from any 1 of the 12 current federal res. board districts]. Whether the Monetary Authority Board would be directly elected by all voters, or appointed by the gov. or legis. might be an interesting debate in itself- and vary from state to state. Anyone who thinks that a plan like this would be unconstitutional [as opposed to what's happened lately in Iraq and Libya] needs to read Art. 1, Sect. 8 of the constitution... and not one word has been changed or amended since the 1780s... not like we don't need it, to avert our current state of state-capture (by what might be termed financial interests).

Presumably what society might lose [at least temporarily] in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) would be compensated for by freeing up media, politicians, and voters from dependence upon the traditional private money cartel's shortlist of favored policies, candidates, and predictable spin. The LAP has a good laundry list of reforms, and its main point seems irrefutable, that the "first step is a national conversation about the institutions of money and finance"- but the biggest institution is that of Fractional Reserve Lending (FRL). Its also the most concealed/unquestioned.

goods

Posted by danR at Mar 10, 2012 05:05 AM
I currently work from home selling export goods and granted it might grant monopoly but as long as it is free it should be good right? I read on this blog http://importexporthomestudy.com/[…]/
 that exports will greatly help our trade deficit.

Federal Reserve

Posted by Michael at Nov 27, 2011 04:00 PM
A private bank can not be part of the our monetary system. It's actions have always robbed America to benefit it's owners, not the country. Disband and dissolve the Federal Reserve and make it impossible for private bankers to have anything to do with public funds.

Excellent Interview

Posted by SkDo at Nov 28, 2011 09:56 PM
This is an excellent interview! Thank you so much OWS, and thank you Dr. Korten!

this is the dialog I want, thank you

Posted by Marj at Nov 30, 2011 01:11 PM
please, lets bring it mainstream! If only this could be addressed .

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools