Sections
Home » YES! Blogs » John Cavanagh and Robin Broad » For Farmers Everywhere, Small is (Still) Beautiful
Planet  |  Food  |  Go Local

For Farmers Everywhere, Small is (Still) Beautiful

Whether you’re worried about hunger, social crises, or climate change, the solution is the same: small-scale farming.

drying rice by john cavanagh

Organic rice being dried by sun. North Cotabato, Philippines.

Photo by John Cavanagh

There is battle raging across the world over who can better feed its people: small-scale farmers practicing sustainable agriculture, or giant agribusinesses using chemical fertilizers and pesticides. 

It was small-scale organic farmers growing rice for themselves and local markets in the Philippines who first convinced us that they could feed both their communities and their country. Part of what convinced us was simple economics: These farmers demonstrated substantial immediate savings from eliminating chemical inputs while, within a few harvests—if not immediately—their yields were close to or above their previous harvests. From these farmers, we also learned of the health and environmental benefits from this shift.

Moving up from what we learned in the Philippines to examine other countries, we have concluded that small-scale farmers practicing different kinds of what is now called agroecology can feed the world. Agroecology extends the organic label to a broader category of ecosystem-friendly, locally adapted agricultural systems, including agro-forestry and techniques like crop rotation, topsoil management, and watershed restoration. (For more details on our research and conclusions, check out our “Can Danilo Atilano Feed the World?" in the current Earth Island Journal, the magazine of the California-based Earth Island Institute.)  

Eager to learn more and network with others from across the globe, Robin accepted an invitation from the Transnational Institute and the International Institute of Social Studies to speak about our Philippine research at a global conference in the Netherlands on alternative approaches to food and hunger.

"We won’t solve hunger and stop climate change with industrial farming on large plantations."

She came away even more convinced that small-scale farmers are our only hope. She also came away excited to have met an impressive range of experts on the subject, including a bold champion for small-scale farmers: United Nations “Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food” Olivier de Shutter. Modest and articulate, de Schutter looks more like the Belgian law professor he is than the outspoken proponent of small-scale agroecology he has become.  

A UN report may sound like dry reading but de Schutter’s is filled with zingers. Case in point: “Recent [agroecology] projects conducted in 20 African countries demonstrated a doubling of crop yields over a period of 3-10 years.” Indeed, de Schutter’s December 2010 report pulls together studies from all over the world that analyze small-scale farmers practicing agroecology.

The result is powerful stuff. As de Schutter concludes, “We won’t solve hunger and stop climate change with industrial farming on large plantations. The solution lies in supporting small-scale farmers’ knowledge and experimentation, and in raising incomes of smallholders so as to contribute to rural development.” As he put it at the conference, “Each region must be able to feed itself.”

rice field by robin broad

Rice field, with papaya saplings. Bataan, Philippines.

 

Photo by Robin Broad

De Schutter’s work reinforces not just our findings, but what another conference’s speaker, U.S. food expert and firebrand Frances Moore Lappé, has been arguing for decades: We already grow more than enough food to feed the world’s people. The problem is not yields or production per se; it is that conventional plantation agriculture, combined with a development model that prioritizes cheap exports over food crops, have pushed millions off their fields. The nearly one billion people who are hungry are in that situation primarily because they no longer have land to grow their own food or because they are too poor to buy food.

The conference also featured Martha Robbins, an impressive young Canadian woman who, along with her parents and siblings, runs a family farm. Robbins spoke as a member of Via Campesina, which represents about 200 million small-scale farmers in 70 countries in a movement that promotes “food sovereignty,” by which they mean “defending small-scale farming, agroecology and local production.” Robbins focused many of her remarks on Via Campesina’s work with other young farmers: “We’re seeing a paradigm shift,” she emphasized, with “youth increasingly interested in farming.” 

The U.S. government is working with Monsanto to push farmers [in Nepal] to adopt chemical agriculture using imported Monsanto seeds.

De Schutter made it clear that his UN report builds on such on-the-ground experiences as Robbins’ and also on the rich body of work on agroecology by scholar-practitioners.  Notable among these are other conference speakers such as Berkeley’s Miguel Altieri, Food First’s Eric Holt-Gimenez, who works with the Campesino-a-Campesino movement, and conference organizer and Philippine peasant expert Jun Borras—all champions of small-scale farmers and agroecology.

Fatou Batta photo courtesy of Groundswell International
Women Farmers Feed the World

Why the question of agricultural sustainability is also
a question of equality.

So, what is the take-away from all this? Well, as individuals and communities, we have a lot to do with influencing the future of farming. At a minimum, we need to “vote with our forks,” to use the phrase of the “slow food” movement. This means buying local, organic, and whole-grain products and limiting our consumption of meat, as Tony Weis stressed at the conference. But beyond that, we need to raise our voices and collective power to convince governments, international organizations, and philanthropists such as the Gates Foundation to stop supporting and subsidizing chemical agribusiness and global trade, and instead shift incentives to local farmers and domestic production. 

But let us not be naïve: The fight against giant agribusiness and chemical firms is a major one. Indeed, a key immediate battle where we need to raise our collective voices, outrage, and action is over Monsanto’s incursion into Nepal. Even as we write, the U.S. government is working with Monsanto to push farmers there to adopt chemical agriculture using imported Monsanto seeds. 

Whether one is worried about hunger and global social crises, or climate change and other ecological crises, the answer is the same: small-scale organic farmers. Their future is central to whether the battle to end hunger can be won.


John Cavanagh and Robin BroadJohn Cavanagh and Robin Broad wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. 

Robin is a Professor of International Development at American University in Washington, D.C. and has worked as an international economist in the U.S. Treasury Department and the U.S. Congress. John is director of the Institute for Policy Studies, and is co-chair (with David Korten) of the New Economy Working Group. They are co-authors of three books and numerous articles on the global economy, and have been traveling the country and the world for their project Local Dreams: Finding Rootedness in the Age of Vulnerability. 

Interested?

  • Slower Living for a Rooted Future
    Vermont is leading the way toward agricultural and economic change. What we can learn from the "Slow Living Summit" about building sustainable economies everywhere.
  • Cornerstones of a Rooted Economy
    Can the small fishers of Trinidad and Tobago become pillars of a new economy when the oil- and gas-based economy finally runs dry?
  • The Coming Global Food Fight
    As aggression mounts with the rise of food prices worldwide, small-scale farms rooted in local markets could avert international disaster—and lead the way to "food democracy."
YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Broad, R., Cavanagh, J. (2012, January 16). For Farmers Everywhere, Small is (Still) Beautiful. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/blogs/john-cavanagh-and-robin-broad/for-farmers-everywhere-small-is-still-beautiful. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

I want to be convinced

Posted by Mary at Jan 18, 2012 03:38 AM
I appreciate the notions, but how do you feed a megapolis like Mexico City, New Delhi, or Beijing with small farms? What about regions that aren't conducive to farming but that have large populations? How do you feed 7 billion people with just regional small farms, especially when the majority of the world's population is concentrated in a relatively small space (cities)? I'm asking these questions genuinely because I don't want to support huge industries. I want to believe it's possible to only work with small farms, but nobody has ever made a convincing case to me that included democratic solutions to the problems of overpopulation.

Feeding the billions

Posted by Ron at Jan 19, 2012 12:01 PM
You can feed the billions.
More small farms means more people on the farms, and less in the cities.
Higher production rates means more food for those in the cities.
It also earns less profit for the huge agribusinesses.

Feeding the world with small farms

Posted by Joann S Grohman at Jan 21, 2012 02:29 PM
Whether populations are concentrated in cities or widely scattered, their food requirements remain the same. Megafarms do not produce greater amounts of food and the food they do produce always has to move farther to market. Detailed comparisons of farm production are made by Simon Fairlie in Meat: A benign Extravagance. My rreview of this book can be found at: http://mofga.org/[…]/Default.aspx

Overpopulation is a relative matter and is a separate discussion.

Joann S. Grohman

Small Farms in the US

Posted by Bill at Jan 21, 2012 06:51 AM
I enjoyed your article For Farmers Everywhere and wonder if you have any economic data on small farms. In Pennsylvania where I live we have an Association of Sustainable Agriculture composed mostly of small farms. I have not been able to get any credible data, but at the same time have not run into more than a couple of small farms that are self sustaining. I suspect because of the cost of living in the US, making a living on a small farm is extremely difficult. Most small farms depend on folks who generate income off their farms. Do you have any info on this? P.S. I operate a small farm.

The onus should be on big ag guys prove they can feed the world

Posted by Steve Urban GreenSpace at Jan 29, 2012 11:16 PM
I agree, I came across a great article recently which really brought it home for me. Small sustainable, diverse agriculture has fed the world for millenia. Let the Big Ag guys prove they can feed the world without cheap oil!

many complex factors

Posted by Enter your phone number here at Jan 31, 2012 08:26 AM
If we are serious about this critical issue, then we need to clearly identify why we are moving to displace large farms with sustainable methods. Just sitting here, I can think of several issues that we must resolve, and we must devise careful plans to resolve those multiple issues.

Just for starters, how about we think of as many critical issues that we can. Perhaps, something like a fishbone diagram will help force the issue away from single track thinking or even just grabbing our favorite demon. We can force ourselves to identify as many factors as we can. Then, make a plan. Here's a link to how a fishbone diagram works. For a problem statement, we can say something like unable to displace large agra-businesses. http://asq.org/[…]/fishbone.html


People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools