Sections
Home » YES! Blogs » John Cavanagh and Robin Broad » Occupy Wall Street, 1979

Occupy Wall Street, 1979

Before there were hashtags, more than a thousand protesters were arrested for trying to shut Wall Street down for a day ...

MLK Tent photo by Robin Broad

Today's Occupy movement is rooted in decades of activism—from civil rights to gay rights—for a fairer world.

Photo by Robin Broad.

Thirty-two years ago, the two of us and 1,043 other protesters were arrested for what one would now call “occupying” Wall Street.  It was October 29, 1979, the 50th anniversary of the Wall Street crash that ushered in the Great Depression. We two were then graduate students at Princeton, and we had trained for weeks as part of an “affinity group” of about a dozen people prepared to commit acts of civil disobedience to prevent what we saw as a greater evil. It was about six months after the catastrophe at the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania. And so, on the 29th, thousands of us blocked off the entrances to Wall Street to protest the corporate funding of the nuclear power industry.

But the protests were not only about the nuclear industry. The day before, we had joined a giant rally against corporate power at the World Trade Center.  Then, in the early dawn of the 29th, our affinity group and hundreds of other such groups from across the country gathered to surround Wall Street and shut it down.  Our group went to its assigned street corner where we sat down and linked arms.  Police were everywhere, many of them seated menacingly atop horses; they were equally determined to keep Wall Street open that day.


The smell of those horses comes back vividly to us both now in October 2011, as we join the protesters of Occupy DC. We remember our aches from the horses’ painful butting as we revel in the vibrancy of the new Occupy Wall Street movement spreading to cities across this country and around the world. 

Journalists have been asking us where this new movement comes from. We tell them our Wall Street story of 32 years ago, which none seem to know. And we do our best to impress upon them the reality that this new “occupy” movement has very deep roots.

Occupy DC photo by Robin Broad

Occupy DC.

Photo by Robin Broad.

These roots were planted over the past century by the millions of workers who stood up to exploitation and won basic labor rights and convinced governments to raise taxes on the very wealthy to create a middle class. 

That fight sprouted a new root—the struggle for civil rights—a battle that melded with other efforts to end an unjust war in Vietnam.

Then, in the 1970s, women came together to change how the Unites States thought about sexism. They created the space for new movements to later ask, if you think sexism is wrong, why is homophobia okay?

Then environmentalists across the globe started asking why it was okay to bequeath our grandchildren a polluted planet. In Kenya, a young woman named Wangari Maathai (a woman whose recent death we mourn) began planting trees with other women as they claimed control over their lives. These are deep roots indeed.

We sent a potent message that people organized across issues could stand up to corporate power and change the course of history.

Two decades ago, these movements gave birth to the global justice movement, and millions united to oppose corporate greed and corporate rule. In Chiapas, Mexico, in the mid-1990s, indigenous people stood up to free trade rules configured to make them anything but free.  And they said—enough. 

Twelve years ago, 65,000 people converged on Seattle to say no to global trade rules structured to give expanded power to corporations while undermining regulations created to protect people and the environment. On the streets of Seattle, unions and environmentalists linked arms, as did global justice activists from South and North.  During that fateful week, we shut down the meetings of the World Trade Organization and sent a potent message that people organized across issues could stand up to corporate power and change the course of history.

Nine years ago, 15 million people in 600 cities said no to war against Iraq.  Three years ago, millions poured into the streets to fight for immigrant rights.

This is the Peoples’ History that informs today’s protests.

Bull photo by Sabarishr
Occupy Everywhere

How what started as an idea
became a global reality.

And if the great peoples’ historian Howard Zinn were alive today, he would be busy writing a new chapter at this very moment. That new chapter might well start in the spring with the fruit vendor in Tunisia who said: enough. It would describe the millions of Egyptians who said: enough. 

It would include the brave people of Wisconsin—who ate pizzas and other food donated not just by supporters across the U.S. but also by some of those very Egyptians—as they took over the state capitol building in February to say “enough” to the Wisconsin governor who tried to roll back sixty years of hard-won protections for workers and ordinary people.

Yes, a part of our history is one of war, racism, genocide, and violent inequality. But an equally important part—the part that is too-often not retold—is the history of people coming together, fighting back, and creating a more decent and humane union.


John Cavanagh and Robin Broad

John Cavanagh and Robin Broad wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. This article expands on remarks by John Cavanagh at the Institute for Policy Studies’ 35th annual Letelier-Moffitt awards on October 13, 2011.

Robin is a Professor of International Development at American University in Washington, D.C. and has worked as an international economist in the U.S. Treasury Department and the U.S. Congress. John is director of the Institute for Policy Studies, and is co-chair (with David Korten) of the New Economy Working Group. They are co-authors of three books on the global economy, and are currently traveling the country and the world to write a book entitled Local Dreams: Finding Rootedness in the Age of Vulnerability. Over the decades, this husband and wife team has worked in a number of countries, including the Philippines, where Robin first lived in 1977-78.

Interested?

  • Follow our ongoing coverage of Occupy Wall Street.
  • Every Great Social Movement
    David Korten: The biggest shifts of our time have been sparked by ordinary people rejecting the cultural stories that dominated them.
  • A Conspiracy of Hope
    Many thought the global movement against unfair trade started in Seattle 1999. But going back over 200 years, people have reached across borders to end the slave trade, shame a brutal colonial regime, and bring respite to laborers of the industrial revolution.
YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Cavanagh, J., Broad, R. (2011, October 24). Occupy Wall Street, 1979. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/blogs/john-cavanagh-and-robin-broad/occupy-wall-street-1979. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

Greenpeace is GOOD!

Posted by Ellen N. Duell at Oct 28, 2011 04:49 PM
What is that nasty video against Greenpeace doing on the Yes! "picks" page? You have been "hacked"! Greenpeace is good. It uses tactics that get attention, and are at the same time nonviolent. Greenpeace reveals the truth about corporate destructiveness of our environment and of real justice. I heartily object to Greenpeace being trashed on Yes! Magazine's internet page. Who is doing it?

Please reply in some way! By the way, I have been a subscriber for over a decade. Thank you.

 Ellen N. Duell <duellsjeln@yellowsprings.com>

Occupy the Email Boxes

Posted by Sally French at Oct 31, 2011 03:17 PM
Can't make it down to the protests?
Reach 700+ million people from home and do your part in a HUGE way:

http://occupyinboxes.weebly.com

(Please post this around)

Accountability

Posted by bob at Nov 02, 2011 04:26 AM
I did not finish this article because it was inconsistant and therefore unreliable. Throughout the article the authors repeat "the two of us and". The number of protesters was stated as 1043. The author(s) then go on to say "thousands". Which is it, 1043 or thousands? I read another paragraph or two and decided it really amounted to the same kind of self promotion that the writer(s) are claiming to protest against.

I do not like big banking and the financially elite any more than the rest. But, if we are going to fight we have to have our facts right and not misrepresent ourselves or political motivations. I think this article could be a great inspiration to the less financially secure but casual misdirection from one thousand to thousands just turns me off to the message. I do not accept self-promotion from big corporations and fighting them with the same deceptive style is also unacceptable.

numbers

Posted by John Cavanagh at Nov 05, 2011 06:59 AM
Hi Bob,
    Thousands of us were there, and then a subset of that number -- 1,045 -- (including the two of us) were arrested.

How the left became discredited from 60s on....

Posted by Fubar at Nov 14, 2011 07:39 AM
John and Robin,

Thanks for reminding everyone of the deep roots of resistance to plutocracy, and what is really a passion play about very old archetypes, the struggle of good over evil, and so forth.

http://www.natureoforder.com/[…]/commentary-for-readers-
of-book2.htm

A Commentary for Readers of The Nature Of Order, Book 2
By Christopher Alexander

excerpts:
Many millions of people - by some counts (Paul Ray, Cultural Creatives http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Creatives) as many as sixty million Americans - are waiting for a paradigm change, and believe themselves to be in a paradigm change. They are convinced that society must change, that radically new ways of seeing the world are necessary in order to for us to get out of our present "mess."

... a real paradigm change - a way of thinking which really and truly changes our ideas about war, equality, money, jobs, leisure, family… all that may be easy to say, but is nevertheless very hard to DO. It is frightening to do, because to do it, we really have to change the things we are comfortable with. We may, yes indeed, be conscious of the fact that we are screwed up, and we may wish for better things for ourselves and for our children - but we remain enmeshed in a system which makes us secure (relatively), happy (relatively), morally OK (perhaps), and protected from starvation and disease (if we belong to the privileged 10% of the world's population who are economically OK in the world today).

But, we ourselves are enmeshed, deeply enmeshed, in the production of ugliness, zoning, banking, transportation, corporate America, making warplanes, destroying beautiful land by permitting and encouraging construction of freeways for our cars, and by permitting and encouraging the ravages of commercial development and strip malls. No matter how much we look down on it, and criticize it as bad, evil, and harmful - still we ourselves live off the product of this kind of America we hate. It is therefore easier to keep walking as a cripple with a pair of crutches, than it is to throw the crutches away, and take the huge effort of actually learning to walk again.

We are part of that which we criticize and part of that which we hate. Yet we are sustained by that of which we are a part.

So talking about a paradigm shift is nice stuff for armchair reading, but very much harder to DO.
...
---end excerpts---

While it is great to see yet another cycle of outrage and protest over the wretched excesses of corrupt/crony capitalism (big government in bed with big business, specifically big banks, big defense and big oil - the ungodly trinity of corporate evil), what typically goes unexamined is how the left itself has mostly failed to self-examine how protest of corporate corruption became discredited in the mainstream culture (or what passes for culture) from the 1960s on.

Rabbi Michael Learner has written about the deep roots of the left's failure to integrate spirituality into social justice movements. Learner grew up in a liberal family that was politically activist, but as a famous national war protestor (Seattle Eight), Learner sensed that the historical accommodations that the progressive movement made to the establishment were fundamentally flawed. In essence, the underlying paradigm in which state powers: war and domestic police violence, were used to create a system of corporate privilege and political corruption went unexamined by most (but not all) of the "establishment" left and its allies. What Learner realized was that the aversion of the left to spirituality, and resulting aversion to "owning up to" the common forms of psychological stress, violence and exploitation inherent to the american "middle class" workplace created the underlying attitude that the left was ineffective, did not have authenticity, and was generally discredited. The "establishment" left collapsed under the weight of the compromises it had made with the "man behind the curtain" - State Capitalism.

As postmodern culture flourished, the right developed a variety of extremely effective methods of building power by relentlessly and microscopically revealing the failings and weaknesses of the left to those that were afraid of the future. Right wing religious fervor increased as conservative churches fed the sense many traditional people had that the left was pushing the culture over the brink of an abyss of meaninglessness and narcissism.

http://www.esalenctr.org/di[…]&pageid=33&pgtype=1

excerpt:

Michael loves [Ken] Wilber's comment that the deconstructive post-modernists are driven by the Tag Team from Hell: Nihilism and Narcissism.

Also see the debate about the "Mean Green Meme":

http://www.integralworld.net/mgm2.html

color codes: http://www.formlessmountain.com/aqal.htm

and:
 http://wilber.shambhala.com/[…]/


---end---

So now, the cycle of conflict begins again between those that want to stay safe within old ways and those that want to embrace change.

According to psychometric research (Noetic Institute, etc.), as it currently stands, about 20% of the population in the USA is hard-line traditionalist. That 20% hard-line crowd is very well organized, and is ruled and controlled by the most corrupt elements of the "1%" - the unholy trinity (big banks [fractional reserve credit], big defense, big oil). The classic example of how the 20% has maintained a strangehold on the political process (and movement toward social justice and social change processes) is the control of the Tea Parties by the Koch brothers - corporate criminals of the first magnitude.

this time around, it is imperative that the weaknesses historically shown by the left in its fight against corporate evil be made into strengths. While this will involve a process of self-examination far deeper than the most of left has historically been capable of, there are many models that have been developed on the margins of the counterculture, the human potential movement, new age spirituality, consciousness studies, and so forth. As far as I can tell, the Integral theory movement is one of the most promising examples of a paradigm shift away from the pattern of failures of the left that the right has used so effectively against the social justice and environmental/peace movements for 25+ years.


OWS

Posted by Rodney Hytonen at Nov 16, 2011 09:21 AM
There is IMO only ONE way to stop Wall Street - STOP "INVESTING," Borrowing or Lending - all of it, in every form.

Stop enabling GAMBLING. It's an unaceptable basis for a life, a national economy, and a society.

Investing/Lending is USURY - at any percentage; and identified since ancient times as the most dangerous crime and destroyer of individuals and societies.

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools