Sections
Home » YES! Blogs » Sarah van Gelder » Corporate Rule Is Not Inevitable

Corporate Rule Is Not Inevitable

7 signs the corporatocracy is losing its legitimacy ... and 7 populist tools to help shut it down.

parody by takomabibelot

A parody of corporate personhood in D.C.

Photo by takomabibelot

You may remember that there was a time when apartheid in South Africa seemed unstoppable.

Sure, there were international boycotts of South African businesses, banks, and tourist attractions. There were heroic activists in South Africa, who were going to prison and even dying for freedom. But the conventional wisdom remained that these were principled gestures with little chance of upending the entrenched system of white rule.

“Be patient,” activists were told. “Don’t expect too much against powerful interests with a lot of money invested in the status quo.”

With hindsight, though, apartheid’s fall appears inevitable: the legitimacy of the system had already crumbled. It was harming too many for the benefit of too few. South Africa’s freedom fighters would not be silenced, and the global movement supporting them was likewise tenacious and principled.

In the same way, the legitimacy of rule by giant corporations and Wall Street banks is crumbling. This system of corporate rule also benefits few and harms many, affecting nearly every major issue in public life. Some examples:

  • Powerful corporations socialize their risks and costs, but privatize profits. That means we, the 99 percent, pick up the tab for environmental clean ups, for helping workers who aren’t paid enough to afford food or health care, for bailouts when risky speculation goes wrong. Meanwhile, profits go straight into the pockets of top executives and others in the 1 percent.
  • The financial collapse threw millions of Americans into poverty. 25 million are unemployed, under-employed, or have given up looking for work; four million have been unemployed for more than 12 months. Poverty increased 27 percent between 2006 and 2010. And students who graduated with student loans in 2010  had borrowed 5 percent more than the previous year’s graduating class—owing more than $25,000. Meanwhile, those who caused the collapse continue the same practices. And the unwillingness of the 1 percent to pay their fair share of taxes means the the public services we rely on are fraying.
  • Scientists say that we are on the brink of runaway climate change; we only have a few years to make the needed investments in clean power and energy efficiency. This transition could be a huge job creator—on the order of the investments made during World War II, which got us out of the Depression. But fossil fuel industries don’t want to see their investment in dirty energy undermined by the switch to clean energy and conservation. So far, by paying millions to climate deniers, lobbyists, and political campaigns, they’ve succeeded in stymieing change.
  • Agribusiness get taxpayer subsidies for foods that make us sick; for farming practices that destroy rivers, soils, the climate, and the oceans; and for trade practices that cause hunger at home and abroad.
  • Through ALEC, the private prison industry crafts state laws that boost the numbers behind bars, lengthen sentences, and privatize prisons.
  • Big Pharma jacks up prices; insurance companies raise premiums and delivers fewer benefits; the burden of inflated care drags down the economy and bankrupts families. But only a very few politicians stand up to the health care industry's war chests and advocate for Canadian-style single-payer health care, which would go a long way toward solving the cost problem.
  • Corporations and wealthy executives fund an army of lobbyists and election campaigns, spreading untruths and self-serving policy prescriptions.

It’s not that we, the people, haven’t noticed all this.

In a recent poll by the Pew Research Center, 77 percent of Americans said too much power is concentrated in the hands of a few rich people and large corporations. In a poll by Time Magazine, 86 percent of Americans said Wall Street and its lobbyists have too much influence in Washington.

#61 Cover9 Strategies to End Corporate Rule

Get the Spring 2012 issue of YES! Magazine

And 80 percent of Americans oppose Citizens United, the pro-corporate Supreme Court ruling that turns two years old today. Eighty percent—that’s among Republicans, Democrats, and Independents.

Some say corporations have such a strong grip on politicians and big media that it is impossible to challenge them, no matter how many of us there are.

But I believe we can do it. In the past few months, YES! Magazine has been researching ways that ordinary people can challenge corporate power (look for strategies in our spring issue, out in February). And we found that there are actually a lot of tools at our disposal:

  • Corporations were created by public law to provide a public benefit. If we the people no longer feel that a corporation is providing a benefit—or if we feel that it is operating in a lawless and destructive manner—we can revoke their charter. That’s what Free Speech for People has asked the attorney general of Delaware to do to Massey Energy, which has been one of the worst culprits in mountaintop removal and which has operated its mines in a lawless and negligent manner, resulting in 29 deaths at the Upper Big Branch Mine.
  • We can insist that, in exchange for use of our public airwaves, broadcasters provide free airtime to candidates for public office. If they don’t need to raise millions for media buys, they don’t need to be as beholden to the 1 percent.
  • We can get our governments to quit banking with Bank of America and Chase, and start our own state banks—14 states, including California and Washington, are considering such a move. And while we're at it, we can localize food, energy, and other aspects of our economy so local, independent businesses and cooperatives can thrive.
  • We can stand up to specific parts of the corporate agenda by engaging in the sort of direct action that halted the KXL Pipeline.
  • We can call for a constitutional amendment overturning Citizens United, corporate personhood, and the ridiculous notion that money is the same thing as speech. So far, Los Angeles, New York City, and about 50 other towns and cities have done so far.
  • We can use mechanisms like clean elections, electoral transparency, citizen review of legislation, and recalls to keep corporate control of our democracy in check.
  • Finally, the reason I am most hopeful today: We can take a cue from Occupy Wall Street and continue to name the source of political corruption—something the political establishment and mainstream media have refused to do. We can occupy homes that are slated for foreclosure, as people have been doing all over the country. We can mic check places like Walmarts that intimidate and fire workers who want to unionize. We can set up tents in public places and in other ways join with the Occupy movement to take a stand for a world that works for the 100 percent—a world where we all benefit.

None of these actions will be easy. It will take time—potentially years of work—to make big change. But just as the legitimacy of apartheid crumbled well before the institutions of apartheid went down, the legitimacy of corporate rule is crumbling. So I’m convinced that, with you and me and all the others out there creating alternatives and taking a stand, we will see change.


Sarah van Gelder newSarah van Gelder will deliver these comments at Seattle's rally on the second anniversary of the Citizens United ruling. Sarah is YES! Magazine's co-founder and executive editor, and editor of the new book: "This Changes Everything: Occupy Wall Street and the 99% Movement."

Interested?

YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Gelder, S. v. (2012, January 20). Corporate Rule Is Not Inevitable. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/blogs/sarah-van-gelder/corporate-rule-is-not-inevitable. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

Corporatocracy

Posted by jc scott at Jan 20, 2012 06:35 PM
Is now as anachronistic as apartheid, this is a brilliant point. We have seen the emperor naked and that rulership is neither pretty nor desirable any longer. No longer desirable in any way except to that 1% who cling to the past and to those few who dream that they too could be in the 1% bracket and hope that it will still be there when they make it. It is remarkable how the American dream which once held such global value is now the only hollow prop still holding up a system whereby people vote for liars who promise possibilities of an impossible dream and delivery instead harsh set-backs to our standards of living and social values all so that corporations can stay in control of our way of life. That movie is over, someone needs to turn on the lights.

Quality vs Quantity

Posted by John F. Dunbar at Feb 02, 2012 06:41 PM
I agree with you 100% but would add just this - while 'standards of living' may indeed be declining now, it is Quality of Life, an entirely different thing, which has been taking a beating over the long term. As a Canadian, I have always felt my QOL has been going downhill since about 1980 but I have read where the percentage of Americans who report that they enjoy their life has been declining since 1967. To me, Quality is far above Quantity when it comes to satisfaction with life but it is hard to measure so we just measure money. I feel GDP is a useless tool to guage the well-being of a population.

The Corporations have already won

Posted by Dominic at Jan 21, 2012 09:25 PM
I failed to see any signs that corporatocracy is losing its power. Just signs that it is taking over and ruining things.

I hate to sound like a pessimist, but if anything, your article made me feel like corporatocracy is more inevitable than ever. While there are signs that people are pushing back against corporate power, there are even more signs that corporate power is pushing back harder, and winning over more ordinary citizens.

It would be a lot more helpful to investigate HOW we can make these tools work, rather than list tools that seems hardly capable of anything and no plan for how to use them.

P.S. From the climate science I've seen, we're most likely already too late. So much for it not being inevitable.

Climate Science

Posted by John Ward at Jan 21, 2012 10:15 PM
Climate science ignores the fact that testes need to be 3 degrees cooler than core body temperature.
I predict we will become infertile well before catastrophic weather kills us.

'Chill'

Posted by John F. Dunbar at Feb 02, 2012 06:44 PM
I assume you feel that is a positive thing!!

Corporate Power.

Posted by John Ward at Jan 21, 2012 10:10 PM
john ward - The British East India Company Flag. This company was a corporation chartered by Queen Elizabeth 1 in 1600 and grew to oppress the colonists in the new world. The Boston 'Tea Party ' was the result. Is it not Ironic that The Stars and Stripes grew out of this Flag?
The Corporations finally won the war of independence in 1886 in the Supreme Court. And they Demonstrated their power by having the US Government bail them out in the latest GFC.

1886 Supreme Court

Posted by Brian Wickert at Jan 26, 2012 11:36 PM
Thank you John for identifying the cause of corporate person hood. Until this is changed or addressed in some way the courts will support the 1886 decision and nothing will change with corporations having legal standing as persons.. Best book I have read on this is; Gangs of America: The rise of corporate power and the disabling of democracy by Ted Nace.

1886

Posted by John Ward at Feb 01, 2012 09:48 PM
Read up on Roscoe Conkling. His lies about the senate committee deliberations regarding the 14th amendment, led to the Supreme court's debacle. I maintain that there is no evidence to support Senator Conkling's assertion, therefore the decision is fruit from a poisoned tree and therefore can be appealed.

corporate personhood

Posted by facethemusic at Jan 22, 2012 09:16 AM
Great article Sarah - A point I haven't heard yet is that by law and societal custom, corporations have two features that individuals don't have. They enjoy limited legal liability, while individuals don't have that protection. Also they pay income tax by different rules (net profits, not adjusted gross income), at a far lower rate than individuals. So if this doctrine of corporate personhood were actually applied consistently, corporations should be stripped of limited liability and be forced to pay income taxes at individual rates!!

Comment to Sarah's "Corporate Rule Is Not Inveitable"

Posted by Neil Meyer at Jan 22, 2012 09:46 AM
Does anyone remember this: "The purpose of SuperStock is to spread ownership of newly formed capital throughout society, enabling the noncapitalist 94 percent of our population to derive income from direct participation in American capitalism." ? -- Stuart Spieser, 1984.

Spieser's approach (laid out in "How to End the Nuclear Nightmare...") is still relevant -- and presents another way that has some merit in our discussions about where we go from here.

correction: "Inevitable"

Posted by Neil at Jan 22, 2012 09:50 AM
Sorry about the spelling ... no way to edit it now.

Public campaign finance without amending the constitution

Posted by James at Jan 23, 2012 09:46 AM
What do you think of Jimmy Wales' response to this public-campaign-finance-without-constitutional-amendment statement: en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&oldid=472744095#Please_endorse_public_campaign_finance_initiative the Wikipedia community seems to want to take that next step, but the Foundation can't because the legal implications of a nonprofit fighting against a direct threat to their existence is different than fighting for a new law, even if it's the cause of the threats.

corporatocracy

Posted by Nolan Olhausen at Jan 26, 2012 08:49 PM
Part of coping with corporatocracy is simply changing our lifestyles. Simply put, we need to stop feeding the beast. Stop driving so much. Stop frequenting large corporate businesses and strive to only do business with local businesses. Learn about family businesses in your area and be sure to give them your business. Encourage your friends and neighbors to do the same. Promote your local businesses yourself. Support and encourage local co-ops as Jim Hightower talks about in his latest "Lowdown". Encourage and support local neighborhood associations. Spend time with neighbors and spend less money on entertainment. Sanctions and commercial isolation worked very well in South Africa and they can work again today here is America. People claim that they are willing to die for their country and for Democracy. How about simply using your own money to sanction and isolate large corporations in general? It can be a lifestyle change that greatly enhances our own lives as well. Money talks a whole lot louder than 12 million people across the planet all demonstrating something like the American invasion of Iraq. Money is power. We can use it. We should use it. We can quickly make a huge difference in lives everywhere. Just try it.

Yep, stop feeding the beast

Posted by Kathy P. at Feb 09, 2012 02:18 PM
Great point and one that seems to be overlooked in every conversation, every article I've read - the corporations survive in large measure because of us and our spending habits. It's the one thing Occupy doesn't seem to get. While I love what Occupy stands for, they seem to think that if they camp out long enough the corporatocracy will eventually relent and start doing the right thing simply because we/they demand it. I wouldn't hold my breath. Few people seem to get it: as long as the corporations dangle their shiny things in front of us and we keep taking the bait, even going into debt to do so, nothing will change. A quick example: every time Apple decides to release the latest greatest (overpriced) iThing, you have people sleeping on sidewalks for days in advance to be the first in line to get one. I would venture that the majority of them are purchased with credit cards with big fat balances that carry over every month.

The only group that seems to be promoting any sort of hit-em-where-it-hurts action is Anonymous - yep, the hacking collective. (Apparently they do more than hack.) Right now they're asking everyone to boycott the entertainment industry for the entire month of March in protest against SOPA and PIPA which will at some point surely rise from the dead at the behest of the Congress' corporate masters in Hollywood. Anonymous picked March because it's the last month of the first quarter of the year and they want to hit corporate profit margins.

They're calling it "Operation Black March" and I think it's a great idea but I'm doubtful of the impact. Most Americans think it's fine to be angry about corporate ownership of the government as long as they don't have to stop buying boatloads of useless cr*p. Occupy seems to be much the same. Get mad, pitch a tent, march through the streets with a tent held high and then...expect Congress and their owners to simply acquiesce? Never gonna happen. It's time for Occupy to put their money where their mouth is.

If we're all really as angry as we say we are, it's time for all of us to do that.

Lets Grant Corporations the Right to Vote

Posted by Brian Wickert at Jan 26, 2012 11:51 PM
Since Corporations have the right of person hood I think they should now be given the right to vote. Once they get the right to vote which should be easy to get since the are now persons and we all know persons have the right to vote. It is one of the foundations our country was built on so I see no reason not to give the corporations the right to vote ask well. I wonder how many votes each corporation will be allowed to have? Will the number of votes correspond to the number of employees? Or will the number of votes they get correspond to the number of shares they have issued?
I think they should get a vote for each stock that is issued in the corporations name..so if I have 500 shares of a corporation then I should have 500 votes. I do not think the number of employees is a good idea because the employees are similar to slaves and the slaves never got the right to vote. I guess that is because slaves are not really persons so why would they expect a vote. I think I am going to go out buy some more really cheap stocks so I can get more votes for the upcoming presidential elections.

Roscoe Conkling and Madison Park Statue.

Posted by John Ward at Jan 27, 2012 04:38 AM
Roscoe's lies in 1886 created a poisoned tree and the fruit of that Tree gave us Corporate Personhood.

Corporate persons are now protected against search without a warrant under the United States 4th Amendment TO That Constitution.

This means that OH&S and the EPA have to schedule their inspections at a time convenient to corporate managers. If you think the air, land, or water in your community is being polluted, or the workers mistreated, neither you nor the government can go on corporate property to get information without legal permission. Just think of the consequences if corporate polluters were no longer shielded by the Constitution!
Here in Tasmania whether it is Poisoning of forests or OH&S the directors simply plead guilty on the corporations behalf, pay the fine, and carry on doing whatever they were doing. No real person is held accountable.
If Directors and Executives were licensed as Doctors are, to be struck off if they do harm to society, other industries and the corporation the are responsible for, we would see less robber baron or sociopathic behaviour by corporations.
Queen Elisabeth the First gave limited liability to the 'Golden Hind' and allowed piracy by the former slaver trader Francis Drake to benefit the royal purse; we still live with privateers feathering their nests behind the corporate Person.
If we simply accept the "way it is" we will continue to have more GFC's, Massive environmental damage and remain powerless to confront Global Warming or avoid wars made to profit Halliburton and others.
Corporate pirates surge forward during wartime and since 1600 when Elizabeth the first chartered that most powerful British East India Company with its own private Army , she let loose the psychopathic pirate philosophy that still allows that 4% of sociopaths in charge of corporations to bring the economies of the world to their knees.

The corrupt few in the business world hide within corporations and to now wield more power than nation states. If their actions cause a problem they have the corporation pay.

The US is an Empire in decline. But, it is the now the corporations and their psychopathic controllers who are bringing her down. Don't blame the yanks, they lost the 'war of independence in 1886.
 Ownership of land and buildings is still important, but now corporate property also includes concepts like mineral rights, drilling rights, air pollution credits, intellectual property, and even — under NAFTA — rights to future profits.

Corporatocracy

Posted by Pam at Jan 27, 2012 07:33 AM
One thing I would like to see Yes! do is some research on the corporations that engage in "best practices" for the long-term future of our planet and humanity. I want to be able to vote with my dollars by buying from companies that:
- More fairly distribute earnings and benefits amongst all employees
- Engage in truly sustainable practices
- Create innovative products to meet human and planetary needs, at a reasonable price
- Empower and support local communities

Thank you.

Personhood

Posted by John Ward at Jan 28, 2012 12:21 AM
Pam,
When you think about the relationship between the Directors of a Corporation and the corporate 'Person' we should see in our minds eye, Stephen Hawking trapped in his body and unable to speak or care for himself.
With-out the love and care of people around him his contribution to our knowledge and imagination would have been lost.
The sad thing about rogue corporations is their directors use the corporate person as a captive that they can exploit to build their own wealth while they pay lip service to shareholder value and in the meantime run down the resources of the entity and scam and lie to stock exchanges etc.
Eventually the corporation dies because the people who were responsible for its good health and longevity had stolen it's wealth and skipped town.
These Privateers are the few who are bringing down the rest of us and those crooks and sociopaths are the people we need to root out and hold accountable. As I said earlier,other wise they just plead guilty on the corporations behalf, pay a fine out of its funds and continue to do what ever they want without being held personally responsible. As Rudyard Kipling said "Power without responsibility has been the harlots prerogative down through the ages".

Well said

Posted by Adam MacKinnon at Jan 28, 2012 07:09 AM
Well said, I don't think you can argue with a solid statement like that.

Corporate Rule is Not Inevitable

Posted by Susan Bulmash at Jan 27, 2012 01:19 PM
I especially appreciated this article by Sarah van Gelder. Often we forget that powerful, well-established institutions that do not serve the public good CAN be overturned. The example of apartheid was well-chosen. Even with the primary leader of the movement in prision, the momentum to abolish a harmful and antiquated system continued. We should all take heart in remembering this.

I am in the health care industry - alternative, holistic healthcare. I deeply saddens me, and often angers me, to see the concerted effort of big Pharma and Big Agra consciously and deliberately attempting to undermine our health and wellbeing. I try not to label anything or anyone as evil, but it's hard when a corporation like Monsanto and firms like Johnson and Johnson continue to develop products and policies that kill and/or impoverish millions and show no signs of remorse or stopping. WE must become aware of what is occurring and do what we can to unite and stop this injustice.

Yes! gives me the courage to extend beyond my comfort zone and take action and in doing so, know that I have made a difference.

Susan Bulmash

Crumbling Corporatocracy

Posted by StPete at Jan 27, 2012 11:57 PM
The crumbling is inevitable, cracks are already forming. I'm optimistic, and believe people will always eventually act in their own best interests. Corporations may have taken over for a while- it's only until enough people realize the danger and cut them back into the little pieces they used to be.

A Bitter Fight

Posted by Mark Haywood at Jan 28, 2012 09:37 AM
Dominic is right. The corporations are winning every step of the way, in spite of all the books and articles written against them. They have all the money, power and influence . If the people are to ever unseat them and gain a new birth of freedom it will take nothing less than a national convulsion on the order of the Civil War of 1860. It's no use in deceiving ourselves about this. We must fight for economic democracy. The people have not yet discovered the single instrument, the stone that will bring down the corporate Goliath that is threatening to destroy the very foundations of our republic. Yet this instrument has been available to us for over a century. The Chinese under Mao in desperation used it to finally bring and end to the terrible famine that besieged China in 1961. While it lasted it laid a golden path between socialism and capitalism. After the famine, Mao went back to the old communist system. He cherished dictatorial power more than the happiness and well being of his people. It's the same with corporate power- the happiness of the people and the health of the planet mean nothing to it.
Without economic democracy true democracy is impossible. This is something we can all agree on- sooner or later we must stop talking and act on it.

Of course corporations are controling the country

Posted by Todd at Feb 01, 2012 12:24 PM
I think it is odd that we are so surprised that corporations have so much political power. How could they not? We citizens are stuck with participating with a vote--a binary form of participation--every few years, and most people don't are too distant from the issues and from government to care. The people can't participate, so the opportunity for corporations is wide open. "Democracy" as we know it now prevents real citizen participation. Without fundamental change to the system, corporations will rule. I recently started a blog at localelectors.org that addresses exactly this question. My blog suggests a specific fundamental reform that would allow people to truly participate. I hope you'll check it out.

white privilege perspective...

Posted by gaian at Jan 30, 2012 07:25 PM
No Black in the Rainbow - Economic And Image Apartheid

this article, from african holocaust:

http://www.africanholocaust.net/[…]/SOUTH%20AFRICA%2010%20DAYS.htm

"South Africa is home to the perfect, and unique, example of the Majority-minority phenomenon. Africans are a majority but an economic and culturally a minority: The subaltern in their own land of demographic dominance. And today the responsibility for this rest with the leadership and their failure to empower and sensitize the people via conscious self-awareness and agency. They have failed in understanding the dynamics of the problem. They are unconcerned with the energy it will take to repair this social-economic problem and primarily, worried about possible economic downtime if any sincere attempts are made.

Still you get Blacks shopping in expensive malls in the suburbs and feeling superior to other Africans because of these "wonders", didn't anyone tell them they don't own anything, they are just guest in someone else's house. Didn't someone tell them those malls weren't built for them? These are the perks of being a slave in a White man's house. So yes South Africa has many freedoms in areas non-effective at deeper liberation; so much freedom it gives people two free hands to hang themselves with."

it's like we don't live on the same planet as you white folks

Democracy is for people

Posted by AFreechild at Feb 02, 2012 12:33 PM
We live in a society in which greater and greater sums of money are becoming amassed by corporations. As a result, these corporations have the ability to wield unlimited political influence without having to disclose their names, threatening to make us a democracy in name only. Sign the petition for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Citizens United ruling www.democracyisforpeople.org.

Liberals -> Internally Hijack and Sabotage the Republican Party

Posted by Fubar at Feb 04, 2012 01:13 PM
If about 1/2 of the liberals/progressives in the Democratic Party changed to being Republicans, and then engaged in party activism with the intent to "hijack" the party leadership, the whole "two party" scam would be over. Most Independents/Populists would support the "hijack".

For those that might object to the lack of "morality" involved, please note that this already happened once before. The southern racists in the Democratic party left with George Wallace in the 60s when the Democratic party leadership decided to support the Civil Rights movement. The "Dixiecrats" eventually became Republicans, and were useful tools of the Republican Plutocrats. Eventually almost all the Liberal Republicans left and the southern "traditionalists" took over Abraham Lincoln's party.

Why is Integral/Holistic Spiritual not on the list?

Posted by Fubar at Feb 04, 2012 01:33 PM
As Rabbi Lerner of www.tikkun.com (http://spiritualprogressives.org/newsite/?page_id=303) has stated, one of the reasons that the Right has become powerful is because of the absence of spirituality on the Left.

Many Integralists (Ken Wilber, etc.) have developed similar elaborate ideas about why the Left has an "allergy" to spirituality.

http://www.tikkun.org/[…]/SteveMcIntosh-Integralpolitics

Goldman Sachs pledge of allegience

Posted by Gordon Chamberlain at Feb 08, 2012 08:54 PM
If corporations are persons we have to ask our politician and Supreme Court when did they seen Goldman Sachs give their pledge of allegiance? This is where the weakness of that decision rests. And we have to encourage more people to ask that question . When did Exxon Mobile make their pledge of allegiance when and where was it done and who witnessed it?

Another way to foster change

Posted by Christian at Mar 14, 2012 07:17 PM
Sarah,

One of the best ways to create this change is to engender in as many people as possible the desire to change their world, and the knowledge that they can do it.

That's exactly what we're starting with our Entrepreneur Incubator here in Boulder. You can read more about it at christianmacy.wordpress.com

Briefly, though, the idea is to create a collaborative environment for people from all backgrounds and skill sets, then use what they create together to inspire people who come to the space for art shows, music, food, or wine.

Once we get people to start being more proactive and less reactive about their lives, I think we'll see a lot of change like what you've described.

At least I hope so!


Christian
@ChristianMMacy

Corporate Rule is Not Inevitable

Posted by alice slater at Apr 16, 2012 12:59 AM
I agree with you and would like to add that Corporations, through their corrupt processes, keep us in a state of perpetual war to guarantee their access to polluting, extractive resources around the globe and feed their war machine with arms sales, military aid to warring governments. We spend nearly a trillion dollars a year on the military--more if you count the foreign wars, drone attacks on seven countries, expanding military bases across the planet. Let's not forget the need to dismantle the military-industrial-academic-Congressional complex!

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

This Changes Everything portlet ad

David Korten's books Ad

Most Popular
10 Things Science Says Will Make You Happy
     Oct 31
Living Large in a Tiny House
     Oct 31
A Month Without Monsanto
     Aug 24
Can There Be “Good” Corporations?
     Apr 16
8 Ways to De-Corporatize Your Money
     Apr 11

Get Back Issues of YES!

 
Personal tools