Sections
Home » YES! Blogs » Sarah van Gelder » How Can We Solve the Jobs Crisis?

How Can We Solve the Jobs Crisis?

Targeting workers, the unemployed, and public services won’t do it. Help us find the solutions that will.

The "Beyond Prisons" issue of YES! Magazine will soon be out. Meanwhile, we're working on the fall issue, which looks at how to create livelihoods that sustain us and the Earth. You can help.


Barn raising, photo by grongar

Photo by grongar

At a time when millions of Americans are without work, the political debate has taken a bizarre turn. Instead of discussing how to make the public investments necessary to get Americans back to work, the political right has used the deficit “crisis” to push for cuts in workers’ rights and pay, without explaining how the economy can recover if potential consumers are too poor to buy anything. The focus now is on draconian cuts in the social safety net that the unemployed and their families need more than ever and for even less regulation of the finance institutions that brought the economy to its knees. 

The left is pressing for more government spending to jump start growth, but that approach has its limits, too. An economy founded on perpetual growth in energy and resource use, consumerism, throwaway products, climate pollution, and depletion of the Earth’s biodiversity is a dead end. And even during the boom years of the 1990s, some were accumulating unheard of wealth while others saw incomes stagnate as living wage jobs disappeared.

Yes, we’re still in an economic crisis. But no, the answer isn’t to throw public sector workers under the bus or abandon our schools, cities, and prospects for a future.

What we need is livelihoods, fairness, and ecological sustainability, which together is our best bet for an economy that can support American families.

There are millions of people with talents, skills, and the desire to work. There is a backlog of work that needs doing: people who need food, homes, and education; communities that need bike lanes, rapid transit, renewable and reliable sources of energy, and rebuilt bridges and water systems. There are empty factories and offices, natural resources, and skilled workers ready to pitch in.

But our economy no longer seems up to the task for putting these elements together.

Fixing the Future still
Good Jobs, Locally Grown

Video: How Bellingham, Washington is keeping jobs close to home.

The problem is not that we’re broke. It’s that transnational corporations and the extremely wealthy have captured federal government decision-making, skewing policies to allow the exhaustion of the Earth and the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of billionaires, while undermining job security for everyone else. Government money floods into unstable big banks and financial institutions, while small businesses, homeowners, state and local governments are left to sink or swim on their own.

Creating sustainable jobs will require restructuring our economy to more equitably share the work and wealth of this country, without destroying the foundation of all economies—the natural world.

How can we do that? The fall issue of YES! Magazine will explore that question:

  • How can communities create and finance green and sustainable jobs? What are the best models for rooted, living-wage, sustainable enterprises? How have communities and work places emerged out of economic crisis?
  • What state, local, and federal policies would be most effective in furthering an economic restructuring that would create sustainable livelihoods? What is the appropriate role of permanent, public sector employment? What policies support local, living economies, and rooted employment, and what sort of movement would we need to build to get there?
  • How can existing jobs be more sustainable, pay living wages, meet real needs, and maybe even allow some democracy on the job? What if we shared the work and spent fewer hours on the job?
  • The cash economy has colonized much of what we once did for ourselves and for one another. What are the best ways to rebuild the informal economy of exchanges and gifts, from child care to elder care, from sharing garden produce to DIY repair and crafts? Can we imagine a society where fewer of us are absorbed in the cash economy, and more of our time is free for taking care of ourselves, family members, and the community?

The political debate as it has played out in Washington, D.C., has taken us in the wrong direction. Yes, we’re still in an economic crisis. But no, the answer isn’t to throw public sector workers under the bus or abandon our schools, safety net, and environmental protections. The answer is to redeploy our many resources to build an economy that can work for everyone and sustain the ecological systems we depend on. This issue will explore realistic pathways to such an economy.

How have you created livelihoods for yourself or your community in tough times? What creative ideas would other YES! readers want to know about? Comment in the fields below.


Sarah van Gelder is co-founder and executive editor of YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions.

Interested?

  • New Economy, New Ways to Work
    Worker co-ops are enjoying a resurgence. And instead of flying off to distant shareholders, the profits go to the worker/owners who keep them circulating close to home.
  • The Work-Sharing Boom: Exit Ramp to a New Economy?
    To cope with the recession, some companies are cutting hours instead of employees. Will the trend have long-term effects?
  • Wisconsin Awakens a Sleeping Giant
    Workers across the country are demanding to know why corporations and the wealthy get bailouts and tax breaks while teachers and steel workers bear the burdens of budget crises.
YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Gelder, S. v. (2011, May 09). How Can We Solve the Jobs Crisis?. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/blogs/sarah-van-gelder/how-can-we-solve-the-jobs-crisis. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

Four-Day 36-Hour Workweek: a Way to Help Solve the Jobs Crisis

Posted by Gregory Wright at May 27, 2011 12:43 PM
Re "How Can We Solve the Jobs Crisis?"

One way to help solve the jobs crisis is a proposal I wrote for a Four-Day, 36-Hour Workweek, "More Time, Less Carbon," in Take Back Your Time's online newsletter, at www.timeday.org/news-vol5issue1.asp#03 (January-March 2007). The gist of this idea is that commuting, especially the monster commuting too many Americans daily drive now, is a major part of many people's workday -- a big piece of the work they do, and frequently the most grueling. As well as simultaneously costly and unpaid. A new 36-hour official full-time workweek that is created by a reform of the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act that redefines the full-time week as 36 instead of 40 hours will enable a work week of four not-necessarily-consecutive days, a one-tenth reduction in work -- paired with a one-fifth reduction in commuting -- which, even with a ten-percent (hopefully somewhat less) reduction in pay, would be a substantial personal time-increasing, carbon pollution-reducing, health-promoting, cost-saving, road accident exposure-diminishing, and unpaid work (i.e., commuting)-reducing benefit for the nation's long-distance and commuters, and many shorter-distance commuters as well.

The Four-Day 36-Hour Workweek is a great response to Dean Baker's question in Yes! (www.yesmagazine.org/new-economy/between-overworked-and-out-of-work), "Instead of having 10 percent unemployment, what if we worked 10 percent fewer hours?," and a robust way to achieve the multiple job-boosting and prosperity-promoting benefits of "shorter working time" that Baker describes.

An excellent enumeration of the personal, social, and environmental benefits of the generic four-day workweek is Aaron Newton's article, "16 Arguments for the Four-Day Workweek" (www.groovygreen.com/groove/?p=2223).

This reform would also grease the skids for support of the recommendation by the "cat food commission" for a 15-cent increase in the federal gasoline tax, which as an environmentalist and anti-carbon advocate I fully support, and as an advocate for hands off of Social Security. I submit that a serious national move to a Four-Day Workweek -- in the context of a newly-redefined full-time workweek of 36 hours, to enable nine-hour instead of ten-hour days -- is one of the very best ways to justify and enact a U.S. gasoline tax increase (which would best be imposed in several year-at-a-time increases).

A slightly expanded version of "More Time, Less Carbon" is available from the writer.

Gregory Wright
Sherman Oaks, California

Re "How Can We Solve the Jobs Crisis?" (www.yesmagazine.org/blogs/sarah-van-gelder/how-can-we-solve-the-jobs-crisis):

Four-Day 36-Hour Workweek: a Way to Help Solve the Jobs Crisis ... and Long-Distance Commuting's Deleterious Effects on Body and Psyche

Posted by Gregory Wright at Jun 03, 2011 09:39 AM
Here are a couple of Google searches on the deleterious health effects of commuting that add urgency to the proposal for a new nationally-defined full-time workweek of 36 hours to enable workweeks of four nine-hour days and the consequent reduction of commuting by one-fifth:

www.google.com/search?q=%22health+effects+of+commuting%22&hl=en&source=hp&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=

www.google.com/search?q=%22health+effects+of+long-distance+commuting+in+America%22&hl=en&source=hp&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=

creating job

Posted by Charles C. Langford at May 29, 2011 11:32 AM
No everyone can adhere to a job with an hourly schedule. I hire an ex-felon who was on meth for 20 years. It is hard for a person like that to find housing, so I found him a room and pay for the rent. He is a nice person with a sense of duty, and a real desire to do a good job. Happily, he can do a great number of things - clean house, lay brick sidewalks, build fences, building construction, but most of all he likes plants, so mostly he is my gardener. He is not reliable in terms of hours or days, but the work gets done if you are not in a hurry. Not everyone would be willing to have this kind of help, or be willing to try to maintain a person not a partner or relative. I am not wealthy and am already cutting back on expenses in order to maintain this fellow.

I credit him at $ 15 per hour. This arrangement means that I can ask him to work for another person who is poor (probably living on less than $ 800/month) who needs work done. He will do the work, it costs this other person nothing, and he gets credit against the time he owes me. Thus, this situation allows me to provide needed help to yet another person as well.

Building on the above idea, I would suggest that, particularly for retired people like me, several people or families getting together to hire such a person to do yard work would spread out the cost.

This is not social change, even on a local level. In my town, there are lots of landscape maintenance organizations who would do the same work. I have not checked, they may be more or less expensive. For me, that is not the point. The people who, for various reasons, cannot work in a regular organization, simply do not commit suicide. They are alive. They are either homeless or in Section 8 housing. In any case, they will be costing taxpayers money, regardless of how they are handled. If there can be a way of having these people do work they want to do and are good at and which will give them self-esteem, they will be giving back to the society. What they give back will not cover all the costs, but it will cover some of the costs, and that portion is better than nothing; their sense of self-esteem will improve if they are treated with respect.

Incidentally, the fellow I hire was thrown out of the house by his mother at age 13 in LA and had to make his way from then on. The same mother introduced him to drugs at age 16. He has never met his father. He has fathered two children - one in wedlock, one out of wedlock; he is a good father and wants to be a good father. He is very generous and honest. He will never, likely, provide child support, and he is on food stamps. Is he the fully functioning person society wants? No, but he is a much better person than one would expect given his background. My point is there are lots of people like him out there - many with many more problems. But this does not mean they cannot be provided jobs which allow for their traits.

New Economy

Posted by Terrence Zander at May 29, 2011 11:32 AM
 For me the 'New Economy' is not that new. I am 63 and the most I ever made in any one year (according to social security) is %24,000. And that was when I was in my 50's. Somehow I have never been caught up in the material world of capitalism. I have found more rewards in social interactions.
   Aside from working various jobs along the way, I also created enrichment classes for elementary age children: Woodshop with hand tools using projects I have designed; cooking; kite making; and a thing I call The Game Box (cards, pick-up stix, jacks, along with random items to make games out of, like a paper cup, string, etc.).
   Working with homeschool programs, after school enrichment programs, PTA's, PTO's, Parks & Rec. programs and asundry others, I have created not a job, but a livlihood for myself for the past 20 years.
   I have experienced first hand over the years that there are many things that money can't buy. And, aside from my motorcycle there are very few material things I really enjoy. Mostly I like interacting with children. I have never really grown up myself. There's a joy in that, too.

Job crises

Posted by Bors Sand at May 29, 2011 11:32 AM
"How can we solve the jobs crises?" By not calling it a crises.

Solving the job "crisis"

Posted by Howard at May 29, 2011 11:32 AM
"We need More Jobs" is an old paradigm. Once we begin to see the big picture and understand the true unsustainable, exploitative and insidious nature of our current economic system, we quickly realize that more substandard jobs that don't really provide a living wage will not provide any long term economic solutions for the People.

What we need is a system that is based on true, long term sustainable well being for the citizens of our world. It's time to demonetize the experience of living and the needs of life. We now live in a world where there really is enough for everyone to have a decent home, food, health-care, education and all the basic necessities of life without having to struggle and be stressed; we simply need to demand the reallocation of values, priorities and their respective resources.

Once we create a society where Peoples basic needs are provided for and not threatened, then we will see the emergence and explosion of creativity, ingenuity, and purposeful productivity that is unparalleled in human history.

Shift toward regional projects and Intentional Communities

Posted by Vic Jasin at Jun 03, 2011 09:39 AM
The change ideas I'm reading about everywhere all are trying to struggle with the system of fiat distributed on a value of output basis. That is a system that is on it’s way out. Really, not so Utopian and/or radical as you may think. As technology displaces more and more employment finding new employable conditions will have to turn toward the knowledge industry. Consider this; to engage and utilize those displaced, some or most or all COULD become a part of an active project of like minds organised to build a community ideally as energy, resource and technology independent as possible on a collective theme of their choice with referendum level democracy and collective ownership of hardware and infrastructure.

Duplication is not an issue when ROI is not part of the formula. It makes sense from a safety and independance perspective to have a network of as independant as possible where large scale infrastructure disruptions are involved, and we are overdue on some naturally occurring ones now. We are in high risk time right now if we don’t plan on how to survive significant infrastructure disruptions. Getting there employs more people building in the redundancies that are the cause of it’s own independance and security, as off-grid or local grid as possible.

Once it gets to a certain point on the way to predictions that only 5% of use will be needed to run the system that supplies all goods and services, we are going to have to admit trying to find new employable ideas and purpose and mercantile competition, fiat, in general no longer makes sense. HUH?

That’s the kind of predictions for 2050+ and somewhere along the way when technology produces more unemployed than employed. We have an abundance of resources and the technology. The will to share is the missing ingredient, an inherant motivation in a mercantile, political, artificial scarcities and hoarding kind of system we capitalists swear to now. Resulting in a wealth aristocracies and power based on accumulated wealth, becoming more and more influential in world affairs.

Not a paranoid view in my opinion, and perhaps a saner thing to talk about. A society that owns all the things it needs and uses to provide all goods and services and only a handful are needed to run it ? Then we better be thinking about a new way to value our efforts and find purpose and meaning on a daily basis. No worry, this isn't happening any time soon and most of those reading this may not be around when his happens, but in my opinion, socialisation, and a new model for social interaction less dependent on centralized governance in inevitable. Vic Jasin

sustainable jobs

Posted by diane at Jun 07, 2011 11:30 AM
Here's one big problem: health care. I stayed home for family and when I was ready to return to work there were no jobs. I am lucky to be able to buy into my husband's former plan (union deal) for a large chunk of our income. My daughter graduated from college and ended up farming. She loves it but only this year, by working for a non-profit, was she able to get insurance. And there's no way she can go off on her own without giving that up. Would you want to farm without health care? So until we have universal access too many of us will be stuck in dismal jobs, lose our homes or just stay up nights worrying about it. I am afraid this problem will continue to be a major impediment to creating the "new economy".

Shift taxes off labor, onto land

Posted by Jeffery Smith at Jun 07, 2011 11:30 AM
Taxing wages makes workers more expensive. Quit it. Taxing investment makes business in general more costly. Quit it. Instead, tax sites. Then owners put prime urban locations to best use. That requires workers. When New Zealand taxed land, it averaged 99% employment. When Denmark raised its rate on land, workers got the highest boost in wages in Dansk history. Also, lose the notion people can only have bosses, are incapable of starting a business. Use recovered values of land, resources, spectrum, and ecosystem to pay a dividend, helping us lose the addiction to jobs.

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

This Changes Everything portlet ad

David Korten's books Ad

Most Popular
10 Things Science Says Will Make You Happy
     Oct 31
Living Large in a Tiny House
     Oct 31
A Month Without Monsanto
     Aug 24
Can There Be “Good” Corporations?
     Apr 16
8 Ways to De-Corporatize Your Money
     Apr 11

Get Back Issues of YES!

 
Personal tools