Sections
Home » Issues » The YES! Breakthrough 15 » Deb Richter: A Cure for Broken Health Care

Deb Richter: A Cure for Broken Health Care

The YES! Breakthrough 15: Meet the doctor who uprooted her life to bring universal health care to Vermont.

Deb Richter by Kurt Budliger

HOW TO BREAK THROUGH:
“I never felt like I had a choice about getting involved in this struggle … I couldn’t stop and I never will.”
Dr. Deb Richter

Photo by Kurt Budliger.

15 logo Meet 15 Extraordinary People Transforming the Way We Live

Deb Richter resolved to fix the health care system almost as soon as she began practicing medicine more than two decades ago in inner-city Buffalo. “I was very naive, I guess,” recalls Richter. “A lot of my patients didn’t have insurance. I would prescribe medicines for patients but they wouldn’t be able to afford them, and then they would just get sicker. I was mortified.”

It was the tragedy of a brother and sister who had been diagnosed with juvenile diabetes that brought things sharply into focus. “They kept up with their insulin and needles, but they often couldn’t afford the 50-cents-apiece test strips when they didn’t have insurance,” says Richter. By the time they became her patients, the siblings were in bad shape. The boy lost his vision, his health declined, and he died at 21. His sister had a fatal heart attack at 25.

Richter realized that she was facing a turning point. “I didn’t want to change where I practiced just so I wouldn’t have to witness this. I knew I couldn’t continue to practice if this situation continued. I didn’t want medicine to just be for wealthy people.”

Madeline Ostrander 2011Selected by the YES! Editors: “She packed up and moved her life and family so she could push for the only health care solution that makes sense to us: single-payer health care.” —Madeline Ostrander

Instead of hanging up her stethoscope, she joined Physicians for a National Health Program, a leading doctors’ group that advocates for universal health care coverage with just one insurance provider—the government. “What they had to say made sense to me—24 percent of health care was spent on paperwork and transaction costs. Other countries didn’t spend that.” She eventually served as the group’s president.

Richter became convinced that the likeliest route to a national single-payer system would be state by state. She and her husband and two young boys moved to Vermont in 1999, where they bought a house just two blocks from the statehouse in Montpelier. It suited a physician-activist who was raising a family. “I could testify before the legislature and walk home to do the laundry.”

Richter kept up her medical practice three days a week, while lobbying for a single-payer system the other two days. She cornered politicians, wrote editorials, spoke to Rotary clubs, and gave hundreds of talks. In 2005 the legislature passed a major health care reform bill, but the governor vetoed it. “That was one of my lowest points,” recalls Richter. Work and advocacy were taking up all her time. “I was hardly seeing my family. If we couldn’t get it done in Vermont, where was it ever going to work?”

Then Vermont voted in Governor Peter Shumlin, who recognized that skyrocketing health care costs had reached a crisis point for businesses and the middle class. The iconoclast Vermont politician Bernie Sanders moved from the U.S. House to the Senate, and was in a more powerful position to clear roadblocks at the federal level. Grassroots advocates focused their energies, as did Richter. This May, Vermont became the first state in the nation to pass a single-payer health care plan.

Richter is proud of the achievement, even though she concedes that Vermont’s health care bill is not quite comprehensive and could still get derailed before it’s fully enacted over the next six years. She continues giving public talks, shepherding the Vermont bill and lobbying for a national health care plan, as well as practicing medicine.

“This will be an enormous change for people without insurance,” says Richter of the Vermont bill, which will guarantee every resident an essential health benefit package from birth. “Now that we have this in Vermont, we need to make sure it happens everywhere.”


Daniel-Fireside.jpgDaniel Fireside wrote this article for The YES! Breakthrough 15, the Winter 2012 issue of YES! Magazine. Daniel Fireside is the Capital Coordinator at Equal Exchange

Interested?

  • Cuba's Cure
    By investing in health care that is holistic and focuses on prevention, Cuba has created one of the most effective systems in the world. Cuban doctors are engaged in missions throughout poor parts of the world, exchanging medical know-how for positive diplomatic relations.
  • Health Care Economics 101
    When it comes to health care, everyone can't have everything right away. But we can make smarter choices that don't leave anyone out in the cold.
  • Vermont’s Bill: Is it Single-Payer Health Care?
    A question and answer session with Dr. Ida Hellander helps demystify Vermont's new health care bill.
The YES! Breakthrough 15
YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Fireside, D. (2011, November 19). Deb Richter: A Cure for Broken Health Care. Retrieved May 22, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/issues/the-yes-breakthrough-15/deb-richter-a-cure-for-broken-health-care. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

Affordable Health Care

Posted by Brian Steward at Feb 01, 2012 06:30 AM
You may already know this but most of the countries that we are losing jobs to have some form a government subsidized health care as well as lower wages. The rapid increase of this employer paid benefit has been a major impetus for sending good jobs to other countries. That said let me address my major concerns about medical care in the USA.

{1) Get the lawyers out medical care. Presently you can not sign away liability so if the doctor, therapist, nurse errors they will be sued. I want that waiver choice to lesson the overall cost of premiums. Presently doctors perform numerous expensive procedures and tests to satisfy legal requirements rather than medical on the remote chance they may be sued in this litigious society we live in. Insurance cost for a medical professional is prohibitive as a result. Choose your doctor wisely and trust him, you can always change if you can not communicate sadly people are aware that they control their own health not the clinician. No health treatment is without risk and no doctor, therapist or nurse errors intentionally. I like to believe they all do their best which is all anyone should ask.

(2) Trusting your health to a company that is profit driven is idiocy unfortunately there are few other options. To cite an example I am all too familiar with is therapeutic care. A therapist faces ethical dilemmas every day as a result of company pressure to make a profit at the expense of a person’s health. Group therapy substituting for individual care which is what you are paying for or a token measure of time rather than the allowable hour. Unnecessary therapy sessions are performed to maximize profits often using your Medicaid / Medicare / Insurance caps and monies depriveing funds for later in the year or treatment in the continuation of care.

(3) Too many specialist doctors interested in a perpetual caseload rather than ending medical procedures when possible. It is very profitable for them and costly to for you in time and insurance premiums. This abuse is often unnecessary and at times risky.

(4) Spread reimbursement more evenly top to bottom. Pay the employees more providing daily care so more and better skilled people will join the profession. One CNA over an 8 hour shift which quite normal equates to less than 15 minutes per. Doctors may be overpaid but certainly the opposite end of the spectrum is underpaid.

(5) Charge the actual cost for a medical procedure to all patients. For example: A hospital will charge the uninsured $20,000 while the insurance company pays $2,000. Be equal and fair with the cost of care and maybe some procedures can be paid out of pocket if necessary.

TRUE Healthcare Reform

Posted by Mary Aspinwall at Feb 16, 2012 02:56 PM
Firstly I'd like to commend Dr Richter on her efforts to support social justice by changing the US system to a universal single payer model. Having lived in Europe up until the past 3 years I have seen things from both sides. I loved not having to worry about catastrophic events, but I also noted that this took a huge amount of national insurance that came out of my pay check or business profits. The key to having our cake and eat it is to look at parts of health care that work well. Trauma care, life or death interventions, mechanical repairs of birth defects or later damage are all handled impressively by the current medical system. Pharmaceutical drugs are, on the other hand a disaster. They suppress symptoms and cause ever deepening sickness, side effects and withdrawal issues. If we ditched Pharma in favor of preventative approaches of the most wide reaching kind things can turn around. This needs big picture thinking starting with clean air, water and food. One way to do this is to build in incentives for doctors to focus on health not sickness. For more info see this occupy teach in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxCkiuLmQsg

Healthcare

Posted by Sharon Hanson at Feb 20, 2012 09:57 PM

Ms. Aspinwall I watched part of your teach-in and thank you for drawing attention to the real issues facing us today.

I would like to add that we are living in a predatory healthcare environment where no matter the healthcare cost if the treatment, screening or drug brings in high profit margins for the doctors or providers than that is the treatment you will get. In the US and Britain, I might add, the medical industrial complex is alive and well. Vaccinations are the perfect example but rather than use such a volatile topic as an example I will stick to what poisoned me to make my point. I am high risk for breast cancer and because I carry one of the BRCA mutations I was told I should get MRIs with gadolinium based contrasting agents (GBCAs) once a year. In the beginning GE’s machine only did one breast a day and so within 24 hours I would have two of these MRIs with GBCAs. I had several and year after year I would go in for the scans getting sicker with each passing year and not knowing why. I went from being totally healthy to totally disabled and because the medical industrial complex doesn’t want to acknowledge what they have done I can’t even get a diagnosis of “gadolinium induced systemic fibrosis” or “nephrogenic systemic fibrosis” a debilitating, often times fatal disease that causes contractures and thickening of the skin and fibrosis systemically including all your organs. You would think that these products would be taken off the market but instead they just released a study touting a breakthrough in autism. This breakthrough doesn’t cure or find cause of autism but instead is scanning infants that are high-risk for autism using the highly toxic GBCAs multiple times on these babies; the same GBCAs that took me down, a healthy woman with no known diseases. Gadolinium is a rare earth metal that is highly toxic in its free state and of every dose administered 1% stays in the body. I was sick to my stomach to know that they were injecting infants with this substance multiple times and touting it as a “breakthrough” in autism.
  
So the point that I wish to make is that universal healthcare may not be the answer as you say in Britain the same problems exist as here in the US. Why? Because as long as corporations control our government and our healthcare systems we will have predatory healthcare where profits are first and patient safety is of no concern.

And so the next point I wish to make is that perhaps Obama does have a plan. Perhaps he knew that in order to reel in the pharmaceutical companies and the medical equipment and device manufacturers you have to empower the insurance companies to keep their insured healthy and to do that you have to stop a very powerful and wealthy industry. Doctors have to prove evidence-based efficacy now and the insurers as well as self-insured employers have access to billions of claims data. Individually we have little chance of doing this but with the help of the insurance companies we might just get there. I’m not saying that I love insurance companies or that I am fond of what they have done in the past but they have a stake in this debate and to remain an on-going concern they have to decrease their costs. Otherwise their profits will be diminished. Their profits are inversely affected by Pharma’s profits. The more Pharma poisons with impunity the lower the profits of the health insurers and employers that self-insure will be. They could be our rabid watchdogs in cleaning up our healthcare system. In fact I think we need to approach them and socialize these facts about predatory healthcare to get them to see the light.
 
Again thank you for all you do.

Affordable Health Care

Posted by Brian Steward at Feb 16, 2012 04:49 PM
I feel that I have the right, as do all Americans, to question why we are being screwed out of affordable healthcare.
Healthcare for all should be a right and not a privilege as the Republicans would have us believe.
We have a right to drive our cars on Federally funded Interstate highways, but have no right to free healthcare.
We have a right to free education for our children
but our children have no right to free healthcare.
The US is still one of the most advanced countries of the developed world in the field of medical science, that said, we are also listed by the 'WHO' as being #37 (at the bottom of all developed countries)
The apologists for the status quo dismiss the WHO as a liberal organization with a socialist agenda.
But the WHO uses criteria gathered from all aspects of healthcare, not just who's the most advanced in medical science, but more importantly the egalitarian aspect.
Not much good if only the country's elite and those with entitlements can afford this high tech medical service, while the rest of us make do with
outrageously high deductibles and out of pocket expenses ( and we're ones with insurance)
This also contributes to us having the lowest life expectancy, highest infant mortality rates, and most accidental patient deaths of all developed countries.
People are afraid to seek preventative medical care because of it's cost, and what should have been prevented becomes an ER admittance.
We haven't even addressed the 48,000,000 or so uninsured, as there are probably six times that figure who are under-insured because of exorbitantly high premiums.
One of the most damning indictments for "the most powerful country in the world", besides the fact that people are dying from lack of basic healthcare is that people are actually losing their homes to foreclosure for their inability to pay medical bills.
This does not happen in any other developed country in the world.
As you can see, I'm very passionate about everybody's RIGHT to healthcare, it's a matter of political will of the powers that be.

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools