Sections
Home » New Economy » The State of the 99 Percent

The State of the 99 Percent

The Occupy movement is clearly affecting political rhetoric ... but what about real action?

SOTU speech writing, photo by Pete Souza/The White House

President Obama discusses the State of the Union with Jon Favreau, Director of Speechwriting.

Photo by Pete Souza / The White House

While we’re still waiting for actions to match his rhetoric, President Barack Obama made three critical points in his big speech about the problem of inequality—a problem that the Occupy movement has pushed into the public consciousness.

1. The Rules are Rigged in Favor of the Rich

Early in his address, the president said that “We can either settle for a country where a shrinking number of people do really well, while a growing number of Americans barely get by. Or we can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules.”

Yes, we now have a President who is talking about the obscene inequality that is ripping this country apart. Yet, it will only be through massive pressure from below that bold measures to tax Wall Street, tax corporations, tax the wealthy, and tax pollution get enacted.

Despite the popular myth that the rich are rich solely because of their hard work and talent, in reality, much of the explosion of wealth at the top is a result of the rich rigging the rules.

Case in point: rich people, who make most of their income on the stock market, pay a far lower tax rate than ordinary Americans. Warren Buffett pointed this out several years ago when he offered a million dollars to any CEO who could prove he paid a higher tax rate than his secretary. Not one came forward.

In a brilliant stroke of political theater, Obama invited Buffett’s secretary to sit with the First Lady during the speech. This came just hours after Mitt Romney revealed he had paid only a 13.9 percent rate on his 2011 income taxes—thanks to the deep discount rate of 15 percent for financial earnings, compared to the top rate of 35 percent for income from actual work. Obama proposed a minimum tax rate of 30 percent for people who make more than one million dollars a year.

2. We Have Tackled Extreme Inequality Before

A century ago, the rich were enjoying the so-called “Gilded Age” with extreme levels of inequality. Starting in the mid-1930s, in the depths of the Great Depression, our government, pressed hard by a militant labor movement, raised taxes on the rich, protected worker rights, and began a four decade march toward much greater equality. By speaking of “restoring an economy where everyone gets a fair shot,” Obama reminded Americans that our current levels of inequality, which rival those of the Gilded Age, are hurting tens of millions and degrading our democracy, and that we know how to reduce extreme inequality in this country.

3. The Occupy Movement is Not About Envy

The president also effectively rebutted the common conservative argument that all this Occupy ruckus is about nothing more than petty jealousies. “When Americans talk about folks like me paying my fair share of taxes, it’s not because they envy the rich. It’s because they understand that when I get tax breaks I don’t need and the country can’t afford, it either adds to the deficit, or somebody else has to make up the difference – like a senior on a fixed income; or a student trying to get through school; or a family trying to make ends meet.” 

Obama’s sharp rhetoric is an important contribution to the public discourse about inequality. Yet deeds are stronger than words. And right now, Obama is not expected to include the millionaires tax increase in the budget he delivers to Congress next month. For the millions of young people who joined the Occupy sites last fall because they can’t find jobs nor pay off their student loans, Obama weakly admonished colleges not to raise tuitions. No word of what many of those students demand, namely that they not be required to repay those loans until they have incomes.

No real relief from Obama for the millions of Americans who can’t pay their mortgages. He said he was proposing a small fee on the big banks to help pay for a program to allow homeowners to save on their mortgages by refinancing. This is small compared to what is needed: a reduction in the principle on those mortgages down to what the market says they are worth.

So, the challenge to the American people remains huge. Yes, we now have a President who is talking about the obscene inequality that is ripping this country apart. Yet, it will only be through massive pressure from below that bold measures to tax Wall Street, tax corporations, tax the wealthy, and tax pollution get enacted.

And, while Obama talks of wind farms and other green jobs, he still is not articulating a bold vision to transform this nation’s economy from a war economy still addicted to fossil fuels to a green Main Street economy that creates jobs while advancing ecological balance. The Congressional Progressive Caucus has released an Act for the 99% that included some of this vision, particularly for millions of new jobs paid by a fairer tax system.

We all know that thirty years of deregulating Wall Street and lowering tax rates on the rich won’t be undone quickly. For years, Wall Street has crashed the economy and corrupted our politics. Only bold, transformative vision and action can restore our democracy and improve the lives of our people.


Sarah Anderson and John Cavanagh wrote this article forYES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. Sarah is the Global Economy Project Director of the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, DC. John is director of the Institute for Policy Studies, and is co-chair (with David Korten) of the New Economy Working Group.

Interested?

YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Anderson, S., Cavanagh, J. (2012, January 25). The State of the 99 Percent. Retrieved May 22, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/new-economy/a-state-of-the-union-for-the-99. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

Occupy

Posted by Becky at Jan 27, 2012 01:35 PM
I think it is important to remember that the issues of Occupy Wall Street began long before Obama, they have been amassing and compounding over the course of years. To expect remedy to happy in a single act is unrealistic. Of course we want our Presidents to fix everything immediately, we always have, and we are never satisfied. However, just as we want our President to help us we need to help him, by allowing it to happen. Flipping Presidents every term like a quarter will do nothing but create delay and roadblocks to the solutions we are so desperate to obtain.

Rhetoric or real action?

Posted by Gary Brumback at Jan 27, 2012 04:49 PM
Sarah and John, you ask at the outset of your article if the Occupy movement is affecting real action and not just political rhetoric. You answered it immediately by stating that “we’re still waiting for actions to match” President Barack Obama’s rhetoric. And you will be “waiting for Godot” if you expect him to dramatically reduce the tyrannical and ruinous control of the corpocracy over America and Americans. In some respects he is a stauncher member of the corpocracy than any of his predecesors.

If you want real action that will really end America’s growing cancer, her own corpocracy you won’t concentrate on pressuring Obama in his predictable second term; on relying on the Occupy movement; or on tepid proposals like a “presidential declaration of independence.” What America needs is actual independence from the corpocracy, and to repeat myself from elsewhere that can happen only by ending the corpocracy, and again to repeat myself from elsewhere the corpocracy will be ended only if and when something like what I call “two-fisted democracy power” is unleashed.

I will close the way you did.

Interested? See www.uschamberofdemocracy.com. Not interested. Then stay mired in rhetoric!

Regards,

Gary Brumback, PhD


Rhetoric

Posted by Henny at Jan 27, 2012 05:38 PM
I don't believe Obama has the power to put his words into action, even if he wants to. The corporate control is just too strong. If returned for a second term, he will probably disappoint the hopeful by yet again proving to be 'all talk and no action'. There is so much wrong with the existing system, that I don't believe a mere president is sufficient to make the necessary changes. I suspect that the talk is just that - hot air to regain enough of the many who trusted and hoped for more. He always did have the odds stacked against him, starting his presidency in the mess left by Bush. His wife's actions, to me, give more clues as to his true beliefs than his politicking, but she too seems unable to do much that will upset the corporations.

Doing Something

Posted by Mark Haywood at Jan 27, 2012 08:43 PM
 If you really want to do something, make a simple proposal and push it into law. Creating an economic democracy by making the land the just and natural right of all would be a good start.

Causes of the discussed issues.

Posted by Donna Rabbitt at Jan 31, 2012 01:43 PM
I enjoyed your article regarding the presidents support and seeming understanding of the occupy movement.

There is so much more the powers in our government could do such as release all the patents publicly that have been submitted and suppressed over the years. I would like to see representatives speaking about the cause of how these powers have crippled this planet's growth for their own financial gain. (ie: free energy vehicles and electricity, health aids in light and frequencies etc.) There are many many inventions that have been hushed up in one way or another and I would like to see my tax dollars going forward to put many of these technologies in place for the masses.

As I see it, with issues such as health care we are not addressing the cause but rather making laws based on current fear based assumptions. Whoever said that doctors and the medical community at large were responsible for our health? That they determine our needs. They are supposed to be our tools. Used to be that we could afford services that were available out of our pocket and insurance was just that. If we didn't care for the service we got we could afford to go somewhere else and get second opinions. Now insurance dictates who a person can see and what services they will pay for and at astronomical prices. Our power has been taken away from us and all we do is ask for free services that dictate our fate.

Lets see some rhetoric addressing the causes of all of the issues and then determine just how the people can once again be responsible and afford to live a comfortable and stress free life and assist preservation of this lovely planet as well. What changes are possible to override protecting the corporations that provide the only services and products that are available to us and improve services and devices with the amazing technology that many brilliant people have discovered that has been suppressed in one way or another and that our government did not support

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools