Sections
Home » People Power » 4 Positive, Practical Steps for Responding to Citizens United

YES! I want to try YES!
Magazine.
YES! by Email
Join over 62,000 others already signed up for FREE YES! news.
[SAMPLE]  [ARCHIVE]
YES! This Week email logo
Sign up for our weekly highlights email. 

David Korten's Agenda for a New Economy: 3 Ways to Get the Book

Posters ad (generic)

Hot or Cold: the YES! Klean Kanteen

 

4 Positive, Practical Steps for Responding to Citizens United

The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United was a major setback on First Amendment rights. What's a true patriot to do?
— tags:

U.S. Constitution

A grassroots coalition is proposing to amend the U.S. Constitution in order to curb corporate power.

Image courtesy of the National Archive and Records Administration.

First, BREATHE deeply and look out a window.

If you can’t see a mountain, river, forest, wetland, ocean, prairie, tundra, or even a patch of sky, close your eyes and imagine it. We aren’t any good for anything if we’re in a panic or funk.

Second, GET INFORMED.

Citizens United is merely the last straw in a haystack of (successful) corporate attempts to extend corporate constitutional “rights” to corporate persons.

The expansion of corporate rights began over 200 years ago as the anti-corporate fervor from the American Revolution began to fade. The U.S. Supreme Court blurred the distinction between  “natural persons,” or real, living human beings, and “artificial persons”—corporations—in 1886 when it conferred the 14th Amendment right of “equal protection of the laws” to an artificial person, a railroad corporation, in Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad. Since then, the Supreme Court has handed out other human rights to artificial persons (corporations), including the battery of First Amendment rights leading to Citizens United.

Since Santa Clara, literally hundreds—perhaps thousands—of local, state, federal, and international laws that attempt to protect our environment, our elections, our safety and health, and our right to organize have been overturned as a result of this doctrine. Armed with human rights and legal privileges, corporations have amassed enormous wealth and power and disabled democracy within all three branches of our government.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission opens the floodgates to unlimited corporate and union spending on candidate elections by overturning state and federal restrictions on electioneering. This affects all elections: school board, zoning commissions, state and municipal judges, state representatives, congressional delegates, president. Bluntly and boldly, our elected officials will henceforth represent corporations first and people second if they want to serve in “public” office.

Our ExxonMobil-funded officials will tell us climate change is good for us as they open America for coal and oil extraction. Our Big Pharma- and Big Insurance-backed congressional delegates will tell us, “You don’t really want a public option” in health care reform. Our Monsanto-owned officials will give us growth hormones in milk and GMO diets. And so on.

To sum up: Our democratic process has been hijacked by corporations through illegitimate usurpation of rights intended for human persons. This is a call to action! It is time to change the rules.

Third, CHOOSE AN ACTION.

Insisting that people rule, not property, is a constant chore in a democracy. As Paul Hawken pointed out in Blessed Unrest, there are literally tens of thousands of citizens’ efforts committed to social justice and a sustainable future. We have a good base to build on! Now is the time to unite our efforts because we can’t achieve what we want as long as corporations are running our country (and the world).

Help spread the word through your networks and websites, as well as on the bus or in the check-out line. Contact your local media and ask them to report on this decision. Get involved with the grassroots movement to protect democracy from unchecked corporate power.

Last fall, in anticipation of a hostile decision in Citizens United, a group of experienced democracy activists met in San Rafael, California to lay the groundwork for amending the U.S. Constitution to end the constant erosion of people’s democratic rights by corporate persons. The Campaign to Legalize Democracy, a diverse and rapidly growing coalition of individuals and organizations, was born.

Its mission is to amend the U.S. Constitution to end the illegitimate legal doctrines that prevent the American people from governing themselves. First and foremost, the campaign will move to amend that only human beings are entitled to constitutional rights.

Ultimate Civics, one member of the coalition, is mapping groups that are working directly to abolish corporate personhood—corporations with human rights. Please let us know of such efforts and we will add them to the map.

Fourth, DO IT.

It cannot be overstated: The ruling in Citizens United leaves ordinary citizens little power to keep corporate influence out of democratic decision making. We must unite to reverse this outrageous ruling—and the underlying morally wrong premise that artificial persons are entitled to human rights.

All aboard for democracy!


Riki OttRiki Ott wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions. Riki shares her story of evolution from marine scientist to democracy activist in Not One Drop: Betrayal and Courage in the Wake of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill (Chelsea Green, 2008). She lectures widely on The Democracy Crisis and is director of Ultimate Civics, a member of the Campaign to Legalize Democracy.

YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Ott, R. (2010, January 21). 4 Positive, Practical Steps for Responding to Citizens United. Retrieved February 09, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/people-power/4-positive-practical-steps-for-responding-to-citizens-united. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

4 things to do

Posted by Ian Wilder at Jan 25, 2010 05:51 PM
1. Stop contributing to candidates who voted for these supreme court justices.
2. Stop voting for candidates who voted for these supreme court justices.
3. Start contributing and supporting candidates (including third parties) who would never vote for such justices.
4. Don't vote for any candidate that takes corporate contributions. For extra credit: don't vote for any candidate who's party takes corporate contributions.

Corporate Personhood

Posted by Sharon Chastain at Jan 25, 2010 05:52 PM
I've said it before and I say it again... YES! Wow, did I need to read this article today. People have been coming to my desk (library) all day to talk about this shocking ruling. I was feeling downright helpless and very angry until this article reminded me that this is a fight worth having and that many people are stepping up to do the work. I'll be telling the concerned citizens I talked to about Ultimate Civics, this article and taking a deep breath too.

Burn Out

Posted by Kitty Hegemann at Jan 25, 2010 05:58 PM
I've been a political and social justice activist all my life, and I'm now sixty. I am so burnt out, and it saddens me. To watch my countrymen and women become so uninformed, uneducated, willing to accept propaganda, and uninvolved is almost more than I can bear. Whether is the notion that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, corporations are good and labor unions are bad, mankind has the right to pillage the planet, the US has the right to steal other countries' natural resources, or any number of issues, I am overwhelmed. I've never seen things so out of whack. It's hard to even know where to begin these days. It's information and issue overload. I have almost decided to just work on local issues. The rest seem too big, to complicated, and the fix is already in. You young folks have to take up the mantle. People my age really need your help. I hoped that when I reached sixty it would be a better world for you; unfortunately, I now feel the weight of this world on my shoulders and have to apologize for not being able to leave a better place for those coming after me.

Citizens United

Posted by Nolan Olhausen at Jan 25, 2010 11:30 PM
     "All in the fullness of time". I am 66. I remember talking to a woman in her nineties about working for causes some time ago. She had worked her entire life on many, many causes and still was plugging away. She said that it was all about making the effort. She felt that it was the right thing to do. Me too. Remember the last words supposedly said on the 9/11 United Airlines Flight 93? "Let's roll." Probably hokum but I like the sentiment.
     I'm going to do whatever I can about this. How come? I have 3 children and 3 grandkids.

     You too?

Nolan

Burnout: Me too1 But here is what to do

Posted by Paul Roden at Feb 01, 2010 10:11 AM
Kitty Hedgeman,

I have felt that way also. I took a sabbatical for about 13 years as to organizing and training others. I read, signed petitions, voted but I was not attending meetings, rallies etc. But having children and the impeachment of Bill Clinton drew me back in. So from MoveOn, to DFA(Democracy for America) after the Dean Campaign, single payer and now PDA Progressive Democrats of America. The key is community and networks. Don't forget to have some fun and joy. Singing and music work for me. I miss the days of the Civil Rights and Anti-Vietnam War movement.
Remember, what Emma Goldman once said, "If I can't dance, I don't want your revolution." So what ever it is that brings you joy and humor, bring it to balance with your political work.

eply

Posted by josh at Feb 01, 2010 09:22 PM
damn, i agree completely. sad to relize, we gotta get out there and make something happen!!

Santa Clara County did *not* rule on 14th amendment

Posted by Matthew Rogers at Jan 27, 2010 11:21 AM
Santa Clara County did *not* rule on 14th amendment rather that was inserted into the header of the ruling by a court reporter qho was a former railroad company President with a conflict of interest despite a specific comment from the Chief justice that they did *not* intend on the 14th amendment status of corporations or any other issue related to Constitutional status of corporations. Any use of Santa Clara by the SCOTUS or people arguing in favor of corporate personhood is thus 100% fraudulent. Read this links and get informed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik[…]._Southern_Pacific_Railroad

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.C._Bancroft_Davis




Michael Moore

Posted by Marc at Jan 28, 2010 03:39 PM
So, if Michael Moore wanted to release Fahrenheit 9/11 before the Bush-Kerry election....everyone here would be in favor of banning it?


Michael Moore

Posted by John at Mar 25, 2011 08:55 PM
It's a good question, because when it comes to amending the Constitution, we want to get it right, and if we're going to affect the interpretation of the 1st amendment, we REALLY, REALLY want to get it right!
The answer is, corporations are created to make money, and I'm sure Fahrenheit 9/11 made lots of money for them. For-profit corporations are NOT created to spend their shareholder's money on politics. So if the material is designed and marketed to make money, fine - that's what corporations are supposed to do. If the corporate "investment" only pays off if it affects the election, no.
If corporate management wants to start a political committee, fine ("Friends of Exxon"). Let the shareholders contribute their money if they choose, like people interested in other causes often do. And those shareholders who decline, that should be their right. When they bought stock, they weren't turning over their political conscience to corporate management.

Getting Wide Support

Posted by Maia at Feb 07, 2010 04:52 PM
I'm curious -- it seems like this is an issue that would have wide, across-the-aisle, non-partisan support. Has there been any attempt to invite entities like the Tea Party coalition to endorse it as well? The more we can work together rather than remain polarized, the better.

Across the aisle

Posted by Brooke at Mar 28, 2011 09:08 AM
Hi Maia,
You might be interested in these articles about the way support for overturning Citizens United crosses the partisan divide:

http://www.yesmagazine.org/[…]/citizens-united
http://www.yesmagazine.org/[…]lutions-to-the-bp-oil-spill

thanks

Posted by Maia / Liberated Life Project at Mar 28, 2011 09:33 AM
Thanks, Brooke, for this links. Very encouraging!


amendment language

Posted by John at Mar 31, 2011 01:16 PM
I've seen a number of proposed phrasings of constitutional amendments, and many of them seem to me poorly thought out. Has anyone contacted John Paul Stevens and asked him if he'd like to help? Now that he's retired from the Supreme Court, he'd be an extraordinary asset!

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools