Sections
Home » People Power » 6 Ways to Empower Others

6 Ways to Empower Others

What makes a good leader? The gift of strengthening everyone else.

Silhouettes Dancing photo by Zer Cabatuan

Photo by Zer Cabatuan.

 

An empowering leader holds and serves a vision broad and deep enough to inspire others and allow them to take parts of it and make it their own. When Rob Hopkins founded the Transition Town movement, his vision was to take the insights of permaculture and ecological design and apply them on a local community level. That was a big vision, far too big for any one person to realize alone. Within it, there was room for many people to step up and realize their own creative ideas and pursue their interests—how to transform a vacant lot into a community garden, how to plant forest gardens in city parks, how to influence policy around water resources or investment in renewable energy. Rob’s original vision called many people into their own power and leadership.

An empowering leader helps the group develop a strategy—a plan for getting from here to there, with milestones and goals along the way.

An empowering leader rarely uses Command mode. Most of the time, she leads by example and persuasion. But when command is called for, an empowering leader will step forward and then step back into a more democratic mode once the need has passed.

An empowering leader also steps back. He doesn’t hog the center or the spotlight, but is always looking for ways to share.

An empowering leader puts the needs of the group first. He thinks about how each of his actions will affect the group.

All of this is, of course, the ideal. We can strive for it, but most of us will fall short in one way or another. An empowering leader makes mistakes. If she doesn’t, she’s probably not experimenting enough. An empowering leader is also a good learner, an experienced and willing apologizer, someone who can make amends and move on.

Keep Power Circulating

The Empowerment Manual Book Cover

The Empowerment Manual: A Guide for Collaborative Groups
by Starhawk
New Society Publishers, 2011, 304 pages, $24.95

Support YES! when you buy here from an independent bookseller.

Power tends to concentrate, and even the most benevolent and empowering leader may unconsciously begin to hoard power over time. When power becomes permanent and static, the group often stagnates.

Collaborative groups need strategies for sharing power and developing leadership in all group members. To keep power circulating and flowing freely in the group, we can adopt a few key elements in our structure.

1. Limit the Accumulation of Power

We can make agreements that limit how much responsibility any one person can take on, how many committees they can join, for example, or how many aspects of a project they can coordinate. We can break big tasks into smaller roles and share them.

2. Share Roles and Responsibilities
Meetings typically are co-facilitated, so that a powerful role is shared. When roles can be shared, we can also reinforce one another’s strengths and compensate for our weaknesses. A born Grace whose strengths are affiliative might look for a partner who is more of a boundary-setting Dragon.

3. Rotate Roles and Responsibilities
Many roles benefit by being rotated—for example, meeting facilitation. Some roles put people in center stage—media spokes, for example, or convener of a gathering. People who take on those roles get more attention—both positive and negative. Rotating them can spread both the praise and the blame around more fairly.

Other roles are more in the nature of chores that must be done—taking notes at meetings and distributing them, turning the compost, doing the dishes after the potluck. When they are shared, no one person is stuck with an unpopular task.

4. Train and Apprentice
Some roles require training and preparation: facilitating big meetings, keeping accurate books, propagating cuttings in the greenhouse. For the long-term growth of the group, we can create ways that people can learn, apprentice, and be mentored in those skills. And when skills are needed by the group as a whole—for example, communication skills, consensus process skills—the group should devote resources to provide overall training for all its members. It will be well repaid over the long term by improvements in function and by hours and hours of fruitless arguments avoided!

Download
"The Five-Fold Path of
Productive Meetings,"
a supplemental chapter from
The Empowerment Manual.

5. Pass Power On
Because roles of power are fluid in collaborative groups, part of a leader’s job is to sense when and how to pass the power on. Power circulates, and we can trust that, when we let go, others will take on the tasks and responsibilities, freeing us up to find new areas of interest and new challenges.

6. Let Go Gracefully
In a ritual, we often drum up a cone of power, bringing the group to a peak of excitement. Drummers, of course, love to speed up and go into a dramatic drum roll—but we discourage them from doing so because then they control the pacing and the buildup of energy (and often get it wrong). Instead, we teach them to hold a steady pace, listen to the group and follow the energy instead of driving it. As the cone rises, the drummers fade back until only voices are left. The voices raise the cone, because everyone has a voice, though not everyone has a drum.


Starhawk is the author or coauthor of twelve books, including The Empowerment Manual: A Guide for Collaborative Groups, from which this article was excerpted. An influential voice for global justice and the environment, she is deeply committed to bringing the creative power of spirituality to political activism.

Interested?

YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Starhawk. (2012, January 27). 6 Ways to Empower Others. Retrieved May 22, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/people-power/6-ways-to-empower-others. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

Leadership is a process not an individual gift

Posted by Ed Lytwak at Feb 20, 2012 10:10 AM
There are at least 3 main kinds of leadership. Command, or hierarchical leadership, inspirational (the kind that Starhawk is talking about, and horizontal leadership. While hierarchical leadership is dependent on the fixed vertical structure and obedience to authority, the other two kinds of leadership are dependent on the decision making process. In the kind of horizontal leadership we see most often at Occupy the collective process is everything, it is the so-called “leaderless” or more correctly “leader-ful.” Inspirational leadership as described here is a middle-ground transitional kind of leadership between hierarchical and horizontal.

Because we have been socialized in such a vertical way, it is easy to understand inspirational leadership as the individual leader empowering the collective followers. This incorrect understanding of inspirational leadership is in part because we are trapped by the language that we use to describe the decision-action process. We see “empowerment” as “the gift of strengthening everyone else,” with the giver being the leader and the beneficiaries the collective group. What consensus has taught us is that it is the process that is key to empowerment both for the individual leader and for the group. Both share the empowerment created by the collective process.

One of the many challenges of creating our new world is finding the “new” language to accurately describe what for many are very unfamiliar experiences – for instance, decision-action processes like consensus. This article is a good example of the tension between using the old language to describe a new process. I find myself agreeing with most of what Starhawk is saying, yet feeling very uneasy about some of the ways it is being said. For example, “when command is called for, an empowering leader will step forward and then step back into a more democratic mode once the need has passed.” There is also this switching back between “he” and “she” when referring to leadership, clearly implying that it is the individual that is driving the process.

While individuals certainly have a key role in collective leadership, they are not the drivers of that process. In horizontal leadership, it is the process that drives decision-action making. It is the process that empowers both the leader and the collective group. In this process it is rarely the overarching “vision” that is important as it is the good idea. Individuals play temporary leadership roles by suggesting various ideas. It is the process that sorts them out and comes up with the ones that are relevant and good for the group. It is the process that “helps the group develop a strategy” although our egos like to make us believe it is the individual. And it is the process – not the individual - that allows a group to “to take parts of it and make it their own,” i.e. the basis for collective action.

Sadly, when it comes to leadership, there are no Mozarts. Only ideas which the collective-leadership process helps to become good and sometimes great. The test of what makes an idea good is not the prophetic vision of the leader but the willingness of the collective group to take action based on their buying into that idea, tactic or strategy. The inspiration comes not from the individual but from the collective process as we inspire ourselves to act! There is still so much about Occupy and its horizontal leadership that we are still learning. Part of these growing pains is the difficulty in understanding leadership as a collective process rather than the gift of a heroic and brilliant individual.

kinds of leaderships.

Posted by Noor a.f at Apr 18, 2012 08:34 AM
 I agree the 3 kinds of leaderships but I don't know why there had been scaring high coded messages from you.I reason them this way.

1.Politics.
2.Religion.
3Narcissism
-If politics we didn't have disagreements.
-If religion, am not radical or altercation of religion was never a major issue.
-If narcissism I hope you translated all texts negatively because there no reason I would take you into quarrel. am just holding no office and you are a successful person. I can put it another way and say am a wife and you are a husband.

If the problem doesn't relate these then there the 3 cases you mention. Well, they must be 2 and all the two I must be honored in any form including praise.
Open a discussion page for it.

If the STORE, I agree its a fault. In it, there is no illegal access of accounts of persons without their knowledge. When hackings happen they refer illegal access but does the store? No.
I also agree that it has to be stopped for reasons including the name of the. Soon, it will be stopped.

  About calling reptiles I mean better business beauriau, It must be a bad luck. That is why the only hope it is in your mouth and there is no value at all. I don't really know why values are not there.
Thankyou.

 

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools