Sections
Home » People Power » We Are the 1% ... And We Stand With the 99%

We Are the 1% ... And We Stand With the 99%

Not everyone at the top of the economic system thinks it's a fair one. Why Jesse Estrin—and many others—decided to stand with the rest of us.

1% Play Button

 Click here to see messages from the 1%
Photos courtesy of We Are the 1%: We Stand With the 99%

I first realized that I came from wealth when I discovered that not everybody’s family had more than one house.

It was a further revelation when, growing up, it dawned on me that not everybody else went to the same kind of school I did. I began to understand that my experience of elementary and high school – going to nicely furnished schools with state-of-the-art facilities in a safe neighborhood of West L.A., and with very little diversity and an obsession with getting students into Ivy League colleges—was not the experience of the majority of other children my age. When you are surrounded by peers in the same financial bracket as yourself, it can take some time to recognize the bubble that separates you from the rest of society. This bubble is what I eventually came to understand as privilege.

Jesse Estrin

Jesse Estrin: "I love my family but feel great sadness at the system which has allowed my family to accumulate such wealth at the expense of so many others. This is a time of collective grief. It has reached a new level. In my opinion it is the beginning of the Great Turning, and I would like to stand up as one of the people who see it coming, and contribute to a renewed vision of a healthy, just, and beautiful world."

 

It was a long and bumpy journey to come to terms with what this privilege of wealth meant, especially in light of the glaring differences of experience that I began to see all around me. By the time I made it to college, and began to get involved with social and environmental activism, I would find myself in the confusing position of listening to angry insults and generalized stereotypes about “rich people.” My new friends—people I respected and admired—were adamant about social justice but had a great amount of anger and resentment toward people with wealth. It was extremely awkward for me, and I found myself keeping my background hidden—even to close friends—and never outing myself as someone who came from wealth. I felt a tremendous amount of embarrassment and shame around it. Interestingly, I discovered that many of my friends who also came from wealth felt the same way. It was actually very isolating. It wasn’t cool to be a rich kid. 

It wasn’t until I discovered Resource Generation, an organization that works with young people to leverage wealth and privilege for social change, that I found a network of other young people with similar backgrounds who wanted to talk about these taboo issues in order to make a difference in the world. Attending a conference they put on and meeting other young folks who came from the upper class and who shared a passion for social and economic justice was incredibly meaningful. I realized that for most people today, money remains a taboo subject that no one ever wants to talk about openly. 

When the Occupy Wall Street protests began, I decided it was time for me to step up, publicly out myself as a part of the 1%, and share my outrage at the injustices that are occurring globally.

This is often especially true for those who have money, and many of the people I met at Resource Generation had families that were strict about never talking about wealth or where it came from. To break out of the silence and actually talk about money was itself a liberating experience.

Furthermore, talking about the ways it was most often accrued (through an unjust economic system with complex and subtle relationships to racism, classism, and oppression) was incredibly challenging, but at the same time empowering. It was through my own inner work around these issues—through workshops, conferences, and conversations with others—that I came to realize my shame and embarrassment about coming from wealth didn’t need to paralyze me and keep me silent. Only after I did this did I feel empowered to try and understand how I could best use my resources to change the social issues I felt most strongly about.

While millions are struggling for survival, taxes for the wealthiest 1% have gone down! This is simply unacceptable. And the thing is—it is unacceptable to every other person of wealth that I know.

When the Occupy Wall Street protests began, I decided it was time for me to step up, publicly out myself as a part of the 1%, and share my outrage at the injustices that are occurring globally. I have to admit that this was scary for me, because I didn’t know what kind of reaction I would get. After all, this was a movement of and for the 99%, many of whom seemed to have anger towards the 1%. With the streets of San Francisco crowded with protesters shouting “We are the 99%!” and “Whose streets? Our streets!” I was less than excited to walk out into the open with a giant sign confessing my status as the 1%.

David Korten still
Wall Street Occupiers,
the Future Depends on You

Why David Korten hopes the #Occupy movement will finally change the Wall Street game.

I remember my heart beating as I made my sign, and seeing my friends—many of whom I had never told about my economic status—reading it for the first time. It took them a moment to process it. I was surprised and relieved to feel supported by all of them, who encouraged me and commented that it was a powerful form of solidarity.

And this is the same reaction I found at the protest itself: Most of my fears quickly subsided as I found myself welcomed and embraced by the whole range of diverse people marching that day. I was embraced as an important part of the equation whose voice also needed to be heard, and whose solidarity is needed in the collective call for equality and justice. And although I know that cross-class alliances may not always be easy or smooth—considering the tensions that can often exist—I realized it is important for me to speak out about my story, even in the face of struggles or challenges that can come with it.

As people who have first-hand knowledge of how the economic system is tilted in our favor we have an obligation to speak out about it rather than remain silent and continue to receive its benefits.

As it became clearer how, by being born into the upper class, I was given many unfair advantages in jump-starting a successful career, I became appalled at the accusation that many people aren't “successful” because they don’t “work hard enough.” While I and many others have more than we need, I am surrounded by friends who are struggling to make ends meet, get health care, and pay back massive student loans. While millions are struggling for survival, taxes for the wealthiest 1% have gone down! This is simply unacceptable. And the thing is—it is unacceptable to every other person of wealth that I know. That is why I—and many others in the 1%—are standing with the 99% in demanding a more just and equitable distribution of wealth. This will require effort from all sides—100%.

Social activist and Buddhist Joanna Macy writes about what she calls the “Great Turning,” our current moment in time as an epochal and historic transition toward a life-sustaining civilization. As I have tried to make sense of the suffering and injustice I see all around me, I am realizing that if we are to survive, we will have to see a rapid and major shift that includes not only economic change, but ecological and spiritual transformation as well.

One of the sayings that my grandmother used to tell us, over and over, was “to one whom much is given, much is expected.” I come from a family deeply committed to philanthropy and social justice, and have recently joined the board of my family’s nonprofit foundation dedicated to progressive and grassroots philanthropy. I have come to believe that those of us who have benefited the most from the system need to step up—especially at this point in time—and give back. As people who have first-hand knowledge of how the economic system is tilted in our favor, we have an obligation to speak out about it rather than remain silent and continue to receive its benefits.

This Changes Everything Book Cover
New from YES!
Get the book on the movement that started with Occupy Wall Street, featuring articles by
Naomi Klein, David Korten, Ralph Nader, Chuck Collins,
and the activists who started it all.
(Royalties go to support the Occupy movement).

Advocating for more equal taxation is one of the few concrete ways that those with wealth can stand up united to give back to the whole. This is critical if we are going to build a large and cohesive movement around redistribution of wealth and long-term change to our economic system.

At the end of the march in San Francisco we ended up on the front steps of City Hall. I found myself drawn to a group of people playing drums, singing, and dancing. Somebody came over and handed me a drum, and before I knew what was happening I was pulled through the pulsing rhythm and into my heart in the way only music can do. With our signs laid on the ground, suddenly we became a group of people using our bodies and voices to express our dissent, our desire for change, our anger, and our pain; but also our hopes, our dreams, and the pure, untouched human impulse to celebrate and make music in the face of it all.

Here for me was the defining image, the common heart of the movement, where all class difference falls away, where race and gender and sexual preference merge and entwine, and it is simply hearts coming together to forge a new way forward. This was enough to fill me with inspiration and with hope for the future.

Long after I picked up my sign and headed home, it was this image, this feeling of the pounding drums and stomping feet, that stayed with me and made me feel connected to and included in the very heart of this movement. And for this I feel grateful.


Jesse Estrin wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonrprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas with practical actions for a just and sustainable world. Jesse is studying Depth Psychology at Pacifica Graduate Institute, and has recently finished a Masters degree in Philosophy, Cosmology, and Consciousness from the California Institute of Integral studies. He is interested in studying the intersection of the ecological, social, and spiritual dimensions of our current economic crisis.

Interested?

YES! Magazine encourages you to make free use of this article by taking these easy steps. Estrin, J. (2011, November 07). We Are the 1% ... And We Stand With the 99%. Retrieved May 22, 2012, from YES! Magazine Web site: http://cms.yesmagazine.org/people-power/we-stand-with-the-99. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons License


You won’t see any commercial ads in YES!, in print or on this website.
That means, we rely on support from our readers.

||   SUBSCRIBE    ||   GIVE A GIFT   ||   DONATE   ||
Independent. Nonprofit. Subscriber-supported.




Reader Comments

Hope

Posted by Part_of_the_99% at Nov 10, 2011 04:44 PM
Jesse, your story fills me with hope and brought tears to my eyes. It is very heartening to hear that so many of us want the same thing, whatever our background may be. Thank you for having the courage to discuss something that is taboo in your world, and open a tiny window so that some of us may see how it looks from your angle.

idiocy studies

Posted by Brian at Nov 15, 2011 08:53 AM
Jesse, your story fills me with despair and brought tears to my eyes to see that people with all the oppportunities for a real education, squander them with pseudo studies such as what you have done that clearly renders their brains into mush. It is very disheartening to hear that so many of you think the same way, or rather don't think at all. Too bad you lack the courage to education yourself about poverty and wealth, and instead fall for the easy nostrums of the radical Left that seeks answers in moronic, mindless slogans that are divorced from reality. Grow up.

Brian, you should take your own advice....

Posted by Part_of_the_99% at Nov 15, 2011 11:49 AM
Your last 2 words would be a good start.

Stop Bullying

Posted by Fubar at Nov 17, 2011 06:46 AM
re: the future of humanity requires spiritual capitalism.

Hey Brian,

Bullying is not necessary, nor productive. Psychologically and spiritually politics has been hijacked by dysfunctional dynamics, and that always leads to polarization, unhealthy attitudes/actions and bullying. It is time to move past the toxic/dysfunctional paradigm and to find common ground for the betterment of the common good.

Both the left and right have become toxic and reactionary at the extremes.

More importantly, traditionalist and postmodern values are in a state of extreme opposition.

"Transpartisan" solutions are needed. If people support politics that first involve finding common ground, then transcending the existing toxicity of the left-right "framing" of issues become possible.

Here is an example of a conservative/libertarian effort at transpartisan politics:

http://www.transpartisancenter.org/about/who_we_are

PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FOUNDER OF THAT GROUP WAS EDUCATED IN HOLISTIC/INTEGRAL STUDIES AT ONE OF THE LEADING NEW AGE THINK TANKS.

From what I can tell, you do not understand the full scope of the problem, and you are proably not aware of the proposed transpartisan solutions - which calls for the embrace of a radical shift in paradigms to new forms of evolutionary transrational consciousness.

Have a nice day.

no bullying, just a judgment

Posted by Brian at Nov 17, 2011 09:15 AM
Actually, I have a better understanding of the scope of the 'problem' than you perceive. And you are right that traditional and postmodern values are in extreme opposition. Perhaps the resolution will be some form of transpartisan ideals, whatever they would be. But I see only two sides becoming ever more entrenched in extremism, the former out of fear of losing its role in society, the latter out of extreme intolerance of any expression of the former.

At any rate, I was only commenting on the pathetic remarks from 'Jesse' and those enablers who rush to his defense. It truly is sad when a young man, from a truly philanthropic family who have put their hard-earned fortune to such good purpose over the years, wastes his opportunities then blames the systems that has offered more people greater opportunity for enrichment and self-actualization than any other in any other time in history.

It is no accident that it is capitalism, and its philosophical underpinnings in liberty and democracy, which has lifted a great part of mankind out of both physical and moral squalor, an achievement undreamt under any other system ever conceived by humans. And it is the system which this pathetic lad and his fellow travellers in the OWS movement have committed themselves to destroy.

Have a nice day.

State Capitalism - the real evil?

Posted by Fubar at Nov 18, 2011 08:41 AM
Thanks for the excellent feedback.

The real evil is State Capitalism, which is a "deficient" form of modernity, not a "free market" system. In State Capitalism, plutocrats corrupt the free market system and cause significant IMPEDIMENTS to those (small competitors) seeking to advance via hard work and opportunity.

Keith Preston: Free market is antidote to corporate plutocracy:

http://attackthesystem.com/[…]/

This is the "legitimate" complaint of OWS and many others opposed to the hijacking of the system of a democratic republic.

The "problem" is that Big Business is in bed with Big Government. Specifically, Big Banks, Big Oil, Big Defense, Big Political Parties, Big Lobbyists.

I have no interest in defending the corrupt aspects of Leftism, I have been a victim of leftist culture, and people can just read Orwell's _Homage to Catalunya_ and other work to understand the history of the totalitarian aspects of leftism.

In consciousness studies terms, postmodern culture is "regressive" in the sense it is "infected" by narcissism and nihilism (Ken Wilber). Thought policing, political correctness and inquisitorial attitudes prevail. William F. Buckley and other luminaries of contemporary conservatism (from the 60s on) made lots of hay by dissecting the spiritual problems of leftism/postmodernism.

THE FAILURES OF THE LEFT RESULTED IN THE RISE OF THE RIGHT.

Traditionalists, especially extremists, at about 20% of the population (Paukl Ray, _Cultural Creatives_, etc.), and they have hijacked the political process for the remaining 80%. They are tools of corrupt plutocrats such as the Koch Bros.

The gridlock and dysfunctionality must end.

The "1% for 99%" folks play a pivotal role in forging a new form of culture that can contribute to a new path to a holistic/integral/transpartisan future.

Have a nice day.

Jesse

Posted by Brian at Nov 18, 2011 11:24 AM
Yes, you are quite right that state capitalism (corporatism) is a significant problem, though the OWS rarely seems to distinguish it from capitalism, probably because few of them have any idea what these concepts actually mean.

And I also agree that "postmodern culture is 'regressive' in the sense it is 'infected' by narcissism and nihilism (and that) thought policing, political correctness and inquisitorial attitudes prevail."

Which is why I see it as a philosophical dead end. But that is not the focus of the OWS movement, even if many of its members adhere to it.

Capitalism, even the state variety, transcends both traditional and postmodern social forms, in that it emerged within the former but adapted well to the latter within western societies. But it does not flourish in all traditional forms, esp. those forms are irreconcilable with liberty and democracy, as under sharia law.

I do not agree, however, that 'traditionalists' have hijacked anything, at least in the West. Talk to them, listen to them, and you will discover that they are very concerned that their views have been brushed aside over the past 40 years, to society's great loss in many areas, and that they do not represent even the present, let alone a future that they fear.

But I'm again getting away from the OWS issues.

There, we see several apparently inherent defects -- a very poor understanding of capitalism (seen in their naive desire to do away with it), almost no understanding of the current financial/economic crisis (seen in their single-minded focus on Wall Street and a mythical '1%', and demands to forgive all debts), a weak understanding of free speech that confounds it with a self-righteous and monopolistic claim upon and destruction of the public space and shutting down of conflicting ideas), and a near-complete absolution of the role of government in the current crisis, etc.

The OWS movement, whatever its initial merits, has deteriorated into a mob movement with no coherent message and no coherent solutions or new directions. They have, essentially, regressed into infantilism, a prime example of which is 'Jesse' and his adolescent plea for, well, I'm not sure what exactly he is pleading for and I'm not sure even he knows.

Ciao

Integral transformative practice - differences in first tier and second tier paradigms

Posted by Fubar at Nov 19, 2011 10:15 AM
Hey Brian,

Thanks again for the excellent feedback.

Short answer:
From what I can tell, the Koch Bros. "astroturf" sponsorship of the Tea Party is an excellent example of how traditionalist populism gets hijacked, and the "20%" (hardline) traditionalists end up blocking the political will of the remaining 80% willing to engage in compromise around "centrism".

That is why "Jesse" with all his/her young-mind flaws, is more "correct" than the people that can't stand his/her "new age" mush.

http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2

Medium answer:

As I've stated previously, we can all do better, farm far better, to get along and define a new common ground.

Everyone needs to learn how to transcend mutual hostility, while still maintaining various principles.

The family is typically used as an effective metaphor: both "strict" daddy (republican/conservative) and "nurturing" mommy (liberal) are necessary for healthy children.

This is an example of how both "order" and "freedom" (liberty) can coexist in harmony via mutual respect and reciprocity.

To be clear: the blame from the break down in mutual respect is on all sides. It is being manipulated by powerful special interests on all sides.

---> The structural basis for such manipulation is weighted far more toward the Right than the Left because the Right has more effectively combined economic powers with state/military/police powers.

A new focus on compassion, justice and altruism requires that the validity of spirituality, transcendence and order be acknowledged.

The danger of not creating balance is that religion becomes the "organizing power" of premodern culture (tribalism, slavery, exploitation, warfare memes). This is true not only in muslim culture, but ALL cultures that retain mythic-conformist forms of religion, including right wing evangelicals in the USA.

Human beings are evolved to be big-brained "imitation machines". Most human learning is based on imitation. Most culture requires vast amounts of conscious and subconscious imitation. The Left will (subconsciously) "imitate" the exploitation inherent in premodern culture very easily when provoked by "attacks". See Jung, etc.

Long version:

Both liberalism/leftism/postmodernism and conservatism/right/traditionalism are basic archetypes in human consciousness. They both contain validity and partial truths. Neither is a Holistic/Integral paradigm, and as such, they are in "opposition" to each other, and can not meet the "coherence needs" of emerging, holistic, global culture.

This "opposition" (at the extreme, really plain hatred) is clearly described in Integral theory as being the universal characteristic of "tier 1" paradigms.

You are correct that there is a weird attraction of "red" memes (gangs/tribes) to "green" memes (postmoderism). This is because they bracket, one below and one above, "orange" (modernist) memes, and they share a deep hatred of "orange" (capitalism/achievement).

basic vMeme chart:

red = tribe/gang: leadership power from ego
blue = mythic membership: leadership power from imperialism-universalism
orange = achievement/capitalism/democracy/science/industry
green = postmodernism/pluralism/relativism

(from Jean Gebser, Clare Graves/Spiral Dynamics)

Note: there are "hybrid" paradigms that represent "entering/exiting" modes between "core" paradigms. In the USA, "traditionalists" are usually a mix of blue/orange.

"orange" memes are the "achievement" memes that arise in cultures based on participatory democracy, industrial revolution, scientific rationalism, and separation of church/state.

At "orange", it was first possible to stop slavery.

"Blue" traditionalists, in the "pure" sense, would never have stopped slavery. They never would have allowed the separation of church/state necessary to have free speech and the great flowering of science, technology, industry and financial liberation that created the middle class democracies. I have relatives in europe that are Opus Dei types, and I can assure you that they would have little or no qualm about restoring full aristocracy and returning control over large areas of culture and intellectual life to popes/bishops, etc.

In the USA, extreme right-wing evangelicals are only slightly removed from the position of the Opus Dei folk.

So, while the traditionalists are correct that "god" has largely vanished from the world of modernists/postmodernists, the "god" that they wish to restore is not consistent with LIBERTY and PLURALISM.

(You are correct in stating the the NON-GOD of {regressive} leftism is just as incompatible with LIBERTY.)

This is the basic principle: can spirituality (and all the NECESSARY MORAL STRUCTURES that you correctly point are ABSENT from postmodernism) be re-integrated into holistic culture in ways that do not anchor it to the outmoded politics, economics and metaphysics of traditional culture?

Can spirituality escape both the "mush" of New Age narcissism and the "slaver/exploiter" tendencies of the traditionalists?

Humanity has seen the suffering and chaos that has resulted from the "opposition" of these two archetypes based on PARTIAL TRUTHS.

It is now time to evolve a new form of culture that INTEGRATES the partial truths of both liberalism and conservatism into SOMETHING BETTER: HOLISM.

Generally speaking, postmodernists can more easily transition to HOLISM than can traditionalists/conservatives/modernists.

For a review of the issue of HOLISM from a systems perspective:

http://www.panarchy.org/koestler/holon.1969.html

| Arthur Koestler
| Some general properties of
| self-regulating open hierarchic order (SOHO)
| (1969)
...
 
1.1 The organism in its structural aspect is not an aggregation of elementary parts, and in its functional aspects not a chain of elementary units of behaviour.

1.2 The organism is to be regarded as a multi-levelled hierarchy of semi-autonomous sub-wholes, branching into sub-wholes of a lower order, and so on. Sub-wholes on any level of the hierarchy are referred to as holons.

1.3 Parts and wholes in an absolute sense do not exist in the domains of life. The concept of the holon is intended to reconcile the atomistic and holistic approaches.

1.4 Biological holons are self-regulating open systems which display both the autonomous properties of wholes and the dependent properties of parts. This dichotomy is present on every level of every type of hierarchic organization, and is referred to as the "Janus phenomenon".

1.5 More generally, the term "holon" may be applied to any stable biological or social sub-whole which displays rule-governed behaviour and/or structural Gestalt-constancy. Thus organelles and homologous organs are evolutionary holons; morphogenetic fields are ontogenetic holons; the ethologist's "fixed action-patterns" and the sub-routines of acquired skills are behavioural holons; phonemes, morphemes, words, phrases are linguistic holons; individuals, families, tribes, nations are social holons.
...

---end excerpts---

The "opposition" between liberalism and conservatism is the root cause of the destruction, dysfunction and exploitation that now exists in the world.

On a tangent: in recent evolutionary theory (e.g., the "dual inheritence" camp), anthropologists have been able to generate considerable clarity as to the BIOLOGICAL basis of the balance between COOPERATION and COMPETITION in human culture.

The scientific evidence does not purely support either "virtue" as being "better", rather it shows that "balance" is best.

Science clearly shows that COOPERATION in human culture is at its most sophisticated levels of any species on the planet.

Until the "order" and "competition" memes that are advanced by the Right stop trying to enslave all other tendencies and value systems, things will not get better.

The Left, in its postmodern "mush" (relativistic/pluralistic) form is in the best position to evolve toward something better, if nothing else, from simple memetic proximity (on the developmental "stage maps").

The problem is that postmodernism has to overcome its "rabid fear" of spirituality and order, and it has to turn its narcissism toward "self-realization".

Holistic and Integral values are the best option for such an evolutionary spirituality and politics.

Integralists honor the validity of the truths of conservatism, traditionalism and modernism, but also recognize their partial nature.

Integralists honor the validity of the truths of liberalism and postmodernism, but also recognize their partial nature.

Integralism is not just a theory about transformative and evolutionary culture, it requires practice and "enactment". Preliminary research in integral transformative practice (e.g., Esalen) indicates that for people in their 20s, a significant transition toward integral values can be done under sustained practice in a couple of years. for the 30s, it may take 5 or more years to undergo the "paradigm shift". For people in their 40s or later, it will probably take at least 10 years of sustained practice.

Adeu amic

*GREEN TEA PARTY*

Posted by Fubar at Nov 17, 2011 06:54 AM
Another example of transpartisan politics, people transcending the toxic left-right paradigm and finding common ground and real solutions:

http://www.greenteaparty.us/

Please...

Posted by Michael at Nov 11, 2011 12:56 PM
OK, somebody has to be a little realistic here. Why are the 1% suddenly making excuses and coming out pretending to be "the good guys?" Because the handwriting is on the wall, that's why. One of the telling signs written by these 1%ers says that her parents are "great people." "They just don't know what to do." Oh yeah, and by the way, they also have 8 houses and countless cars.(!)

I'm sorry; I call balogna. "Great people" wouldn't THINK to own 8 houses. Great people don't need or WANT that many cars. And I think these "great people" are all for the redistribution of wealth ... but not where it crimps the lifestyles that their dysfunctional brains are used to from a lifetime of being over-luxuried and coddled.

These people are such hypocrites. If they wanted redistribution of wealth, they would do things like give money way to everyday people that need it. I have not heard of one story where a rich person just whipped out a check and paid off a non-rich friend's student loans. It's nice to spend money on some foundation or a non-profit, but they never just help real people in real life. They either only socialize with other super rich people, or keep it hush-hush if they're around us regular folk.

So I'm sorry if I think these 1%ers are just a bunch of posers. They just don't want their heads on the chopping block when it comes time to prosecute the criminality of being super rich and standing idly by while all these injustices continued. Where were these people before the protests started happening? For shame. A day late and billions of dollars short. They have been hiding. But now things are getting real, and they realize they better cut their losses and pony up some cardboard signs and look all interested.

I have an idea. Instead of a lousy magic marker and some low-res snapshots, how about getting together and investing in a huge freaking billboard in times square that says the things they're saying? Then maybe I'd be listening.

Please...

Posted by CJ at Nov 12, 2011 08:25 PM
Michael,
I understand some of your anger - it reflects the disgruntlement I sometimes feel at the 99% - what did it take for you guys to realize the disparity between the classes, that our government was being swayed by big monied forces and not in our best interest - what did it take - a complete financial meltdown...it took the 99% actually FEELING the effects - losing their Ipods and DirectTV subscriptions and their money to buy the newest car or phone...

I've seen it from all sides...I was born, probably not to the 1%, but enough to be wealthy...and I've also been so marginal in society...that I probably couldn't even qualify for the 99%...my point is from my vantage point in both spheres I could see people hungry, homeless, hurting...and there was no outcry for these people...in fact it was my experience that the middle class...the 99% looked down on these people...it was their OWN FAULT after all...

But now that the middle class is sharing the cup with the marginal, the most downcast in our society...the tables have turned...

...So see, we can all put on our self-righteous hats and point endless fingers of blame and disgust...

*OR* We can stop and recognize the humanity in everyone...accept and forgive people who have wronged us...honor people who strive for justice, even if they belong to the "opposition"...encourage people who are trying to do the right thing no matter what their background or experience...have understanding what institutions and systems have on individual behavior...encourage compassion for all so we can really begin to have a world worth living in...

...And most of all, please, please, please...stop dehumanizing people who don't have your same viewpoint...once you cast the "other" as the "enemy"...then it's quite easy to put them all on the "chopping block" as you say...

And we've already seen many times over what kind of world THAT looks like...

Good luck with your passion, I hope that you will entertain a little temperance.

BoBos in paradise?

Posted by Fubar at Nov 13, 2011 10:12 AM
Robert Bellah and other social theorists first began to express concern about a postmodern crisis in american culture 25 years ago:

http://www.scu.edu/[…]/homepage.html

http://www.scottlondon.com/interviews/hillman.html

In brief, narcissism became inherent to postmodern wealth, as well as throughout the areas of culture influenced by corporate wealth, mass media, and so forth.

Many traditionalists saw the culture careening over the brink of an abyss of meaninglessness and selfishness. This have huge energy to conservatives that invoked backward religious ideas as the solution.

As David Brooks explained, the new wealth obliterated the historical difference between bohemians (remnants of the old refined elites) and the bourgeoisie (the new, "uncultured" capitalist elites).

Thus, many of the new wealthy in the USA exist in a mixed "BoBo" culture: they are of the bourgeois (business classes), but are sympatico with bohemian ideas and values.

In my opinion, the new vision should be based on finding something "spiritual" or "enlightened" for people to find value in. In other words, turn selfishness into "self-realization".

One of the more well developed frameworks for doing that is Holistic/Integral theory. The integral movement specifically addresses the problems with postmodernity.

http://wilber.shambhala.com/html/books/kosmos/index.cfm/

Billboard

Posted by Part_of_the_99% at Nov 15, 2011 12:22 PM
I really like your billboard in Times Square idea! I think that would be incredible.
I may be a die-hard optimist, but I see 1%ers joining the 99% as a positive step. Yes, there is gross hypocrisy, but the fact some of them are starting to see it and realize how harmful this inequality is has to be a step in the right direction.
Personally, I think it will probably come a revolution before any real change occurs...human nature is to hold onto what you have....hopefully it won't be too violent or drawn-out.

Holistic/Integral paradigm

Posted by Fubar at Nov 12, 2011 08:51 AM
Integral theory (http://www.integraltheoryconference.org) is not just "feel good" postmodern stuff, narcissism/nihilism (e.g. LOHAS), it should tap into the mostly dormant forms of american populism and the spirit of independence and self-reliance that was crushed by State Capitalism (socialism for rich people).

Progressive agendas have long been falsely appropriated by those that profit from conflict with conservatives. This is a great healing that has gone undone.

http://www.shambhalasun.com[…]t&task=view&id=2289

---excerpt---

Shambhala Sun | July 1999

Liberalism and Religion - We Should Talk

By: Ken Wilber

Liberalism's objections to mythic forms do not apply to formless awareness. Thus liberalism and authentic spirituality can walk hand in hand. There are two major dialogues in the modern world that I believe must take place, one between science and religion, and then one between religion and liberalism.

The way it is now, the modern world really is divided into two major and warring camps, science and liberalism on the one hand, and religion and conservatism on the other. And the key to getting these two camps together is first, to get religion past science, and then second, to get religion past liberalism, because both science and liberalism are deeply anti-spiritual.
...
---end---

Hopefully the "1% for 99%" movement will lead to actual political change, including a realistic understanding of how the "system" was originally rigged by monopolists and plutocrats, and how to organize a movement to "un-rig" the tax system, global trade system, etc.

Christopher Alexander, father of Pattern Language theory, had much to say that is of very concrete nature, see "The Nature of Order" for good places to start.

Study history carefully, especially how totalitarianism/fascism arises from "reformers" responding to a crisis in the middle class economy.

Secret of Oz - History of Central Bank Scams

Posted by Fubar at Nov 13, 2011 09:42 AM
The Evil is not really on Wall street - except symbolically

"The Man Behind the curtain", explained:

http://www.secretofoz.com/i[…]cle&id=63&Itemid=76

There are many sources of exotic or "underground" information on the core problem: the USA has a long history of politics being corrupted by those behind central banking schemes and scams. The Virginia Planters (establishment Anglicans) mainly supported the Declaration of Independence (a radical document at the time that asserted liberty from corrupt traditional authority) and Revolutionary War because the tobacco farmers had repeatedly been exploited by London banks and had their right to "happiness" (economic opportunity and prosperity) infringed. Some things never change.

The corrupt systems that the USA declared independence from was Manorialism and Mercantilism: wealthy and privileged elites (including the high church and aristocracy) controlled access to economic opportunity via a rigid class system and military/police state powers. In europe, most people were enslaved or serfs. In the colonies, worse exploitation was vast and pervasive. Wall street first became a center of wealth by financing the SLAVE TRADE! Wall Street's DNA is rooted in RACISM and IMPERIALISM.

The industrial revolution and a rising middle class made slavery unnecessary since machines did the work of slaves, but the basic problem remained: a lack of structural obstacles to democracy being hijacked by those who would marry economic power to the police powers of the state.
(Alexis de Tocqueville predicted in *1840* that the american people would become "weak and servile" in the face of a strong centralized state ruling a fragmented, multicultural/multilinguistic/multireligious society.)

http://dnipogo.org/labyrinth/

It is time that the people demand that Big Business and Big Government get out of bed with each other.

It is time that the people demand that their right to evolve a holistic global culture that can heal the planet and restore AUTHENTIC forms of culture and values INDEPENDENT FROM CORPORATE AGENDAS.

Habermas on "Colonization of Lifeworld by System":

http://people.ucalgary.ca/~frank/habermas.html

...
The crisis of contemporary modernity (what remains unfinished about modernity as a project) is that the systems media (A & G) have become de-coupled from the lifeworld and its media (I & L). The “societal community” of I & L are increasingly colonized, in the sense that members of the community have less sphere for communicative action. Their relationships are increasingly mediated, locally, by money and power. McDonalds is one example; the contemporary university is another. In the university, department meetings could, ideally, be a place where communicative action takes place and influence and value-commitments are regenerated. We could, in those meetings, attempt to reach common understandings. In one meeting we were discussing a proposed change to the curriculum. I was trying to ask a colleague why s/he wanted this change; my “communicative action” involved asking what s/he was trying to teach, how that teaching was going, and so forth. The colleague’s response was: “If you don’t like the change, vote against it.” In other words, s/he didn’t want to talk, explain, or reach a common understanding. Instead we would each gather votes and whoever had the most votes would win. Systems media (power, votes) had pushed out lifeworld media (appeals to common value commitments as a basis of influencing colleagues to believe one option or the other best represented who we want to be, as a departmental community). It’s important to understand that this colleague acted in a milieu that the university as a system creates: money and power dominate, and local understands don’t count for much. The colleague was part of this colonization process, but s/he was only reflecting a larger process.
...
---

http://www.libertarian.co.uk/lapubs/econn/econn112.htm

Free Enterprise: The Antidote to Corporate Plutocracy
Keith Preston
Economic Notes No. 112
ISSN 0267-7164 ISBN 1856376303

excerpt:

The phrase “means of acquiring credit” ... is a particularly significant one as the purpose of state control over banking and the issuance of money serves to narrowly constrict the supply of available credit which in turn renders entrepreneurship [***]inaccessible[***] to the majority of the population at large. Indeed, Murray Rothbard argued that bankers as a class “are inherently inclined towards statism”4 as they are typically involved with unsound practices, such as [*]fractional reserve credit[*], that subsequently lead to calls for assistance from the state, or derive much of their business from direct involvement with the state, for instance, through the underwriting of government bonds. Therefore, the banking class becomes the financial arm of the state not only by specifically underwriting the activities of the state, such as war, plunder and repression, but also by serving to create and maintain a plutocracy of businessmen, manufacturers, politically-connected elites and others able to obtain access to the narrowly constricted supply of credit within the context of the market distortions generated by the state’s money monopoly.
...

---end---

Also see: http://attackthesystem.com/

So this is the origin of "state capitalism" - it was not a true "free enterprise" system, and the finance corporations and industries that grew from it over the last 150 years - which frequently became enriched in cyclical "boom and bust" speculative bubbles that REPEATEDLY VAPORIZED MIDDLE CLASS WEALTH - have never had any illusion that they could exist in their current form without the use of CORRUPT STATE POLICE POWERS to maintain economic inequality and to limit people's "access" to economic opportunity - including the use of public (state) schools to indoctrinate people into intellectual dependence on the rigged economic scheme of state capitalism and corporate mass media.

After decades of labor wars (1890-1920) union organizing was made part of the legal system to strike a bargain between owners and workers: the "New Deal" was born to attempt stability and a larger share of prosperity for the poor, working and middle classes.

FDR's new deal became unhinged because it did not address spiritual well being and other cultural issues that are inevitably sacrificed when allowing corporatists and plutocrats to "colonize" the organs of state power via corporate lobbyists, etc.

Disinformacracy:
http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book/10.html

See the section titled "The Selling of Democracy: Commodification and the Public Sphere".

excerpt:

The idea that public opinion can be manufactured and the fact that electronic spectacles can capture the attention of a majority of the citizenry damaged the foundations of democracy. According to Habermas,

    It is no accident that these concepts of the public sphere and public opinion were not formed until the eighteenth century. They derive their specific meaning from a concrete historical situation. It was then that one learned to distinguish between opinion and public opinion. . . . Public opinion, in terms of its very idea, can be formed only if a public that engages in rational discussion exists. Public discussions that are institutionally protected and that take, with critical intent, the exercise of political authority as their theme have not existed since time immemorial.

The public sphere and democracy were born at the same time, from the same sources. Now that the public sphere, cut off from its roots, seems to be dying, democracy is in danger, too.

The concept of the public sphere as discussed by Habermas and others includes several [*]requirements for authenticity[*] that people who live in democratic societies would recognize: open access, voluntary participation, participation outside institutional roles, the generation of public opinion through assemblies of citizens who engage in rational argument, the freedom to express opinions, and the freedom to discuss matters of the state and criticize the way state power is organized. Acts of speech and publication that specifically discuss the state are perhaps the most important kind protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and similar civil guarantees elsewhere in the world.

Tax the Rich?

Posted by Will Reanes at Nov 19, 2011 12:46 AM
Any notion of getting the "rich to pay" misses several points, notably that these folks don't yet grasp that the federal government is criminally insane, and to willingly give them ANY of your money is foolish, and makes one complicit in their mass murder. Would you give a belligerent drunk a loaded Uzi?
It's so bizarre how most OWS folks want the government to fix this mess! They won't even prosecute the obvious frauds that have occurred. The very same govt that the OWS wants to give MORE money and power (guns)to in order to fix this financial mess, ARE THE VERY ONES that created the mess and whose cronies continue to rake in millions from it.
Tax the rich is just another scam to benefit the State, while continuing to shelter the real criminals.
The most patriotic thing an American can do is not pay taxes, and give to charity what their conscience and pocketbook can. "You reaching into your pocket for money to give to a less fortunate human is one of the most admirable and noble acts a man can make. But if you reach into MY pocket for the same money for the same recipient, then sir, you are a thief."
The most moral thing Americans can do is to stop supporting the mass murdering, criminally insane regime in DC, by opting out of their system as much as is possible, and as peacefully as possible.

New Political Compass

Posted by Fubar at Nov 19, 2011 10:40 AM
Hey Will,

You are correct as far as the facts you state, but you leave out a lot of important considerations.

Both the Left and Right are dominated not by LIBERTY, but by ORDER.

Both right and Left pay "lip service" to LIBERTY, but don't really operate in favor of LIBERTY.

The problem is the Order-right and Order-Left have colluded to create the "insanity".

"Big business" is in bed with "Big government".

The whole point of the separation of powers in a democratic republic is to prevent the mingling of the Police/Law Powers of the state with the Economic powers of business.

The "social consensus" that developed after the wretched excesses of the monopolists (and 30 years of subsequent labor wars 1890-1920) in the industrial revolution was for the "owners" (wealthy) to pay for the costs of the *public* infrastructure necessary to support their business operations. (roads, sewers, water systems, security, stable food production, electrical/telecommunication grids, education, etc.)

Since the 80s, the rich no longer wanted to pay for the infrastructure necessary to support their business operations!!! Bizarro. Them to add insult to injury, they convinced silly people in the middle classes to that some small tax breaks for the middle were somehow also good! This pandering to low instincts is the real "insanity".

Now, we have undereducated population, crumbling infrastructure and a crashed middle class economy as jobs are taken out of the country. CORPORATE PROFITS ARE UP. the top .03% are allowed to OFF-SHORE their wealth at 0% taxation even though their businesses are ALL built in a foundation of PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE that they no longer want to pay for!

And, Reagan made all of the above INSANITY equal to "PATRIOTISM"!

That is the real lunacy.

The most corrupting ANTI-LIBERTY forms of government are those in which the police powers of the state are mingled with the economic powers of businesses/corporations.

The USA is now almost completely a PLUTOCRACY not a DEMOCRACY.

Silly squabbles between conservatives and librals are just one of the many ways that the "sheeple" are kept divided against each other in pointless distractions so that they do not recognize the "real problem":

State Capitalism.

Have a nice day.

Still trying to figure this out

Posted by Francisco at Nov 20, 2011 02:11 PM
I understand the desire to hold those with money to accountability. The bailout was not that...it only gave money to the few. However, where is the truth that one must sacrifice and work hard with discipline to create a life worth living. It seems this movement lowers people into pits they cannot get out of because we confirm that they are the lower 99%. We tell them that they are not able to change their life and take personal responsibility for their own life and direction. Why?....because for years we spent, spent, spent...and when didn't have the money we borrowed, borrowed and borrowed until we had to bankrupt, bankrupt and become dependent on the federal government to bail us out....daily.
There has got to be a better way, though I'm glad this movement is exposing this issue more and more.
I live in my office of the business I started due to lack of money to buy a home or rent; and this economic environment is rough....yet, I'm still striving to build my company and reading many books on moving forward, ie. The Compound Effect...which everyone should read.
Anyway, I support holding others accountable for their spending and earnings; but I also hold those will litte (ie. me) with the accountability to strive to become a better person and earner....so that we all can lift the boat up out of the well together.

Infrastructure, infrastructure, infrsatructure

Posted by Fubar at Dec 03, 2011 12:26 PM
Hey Francisco,

Your business presumably exists BOTH because of your (and your family's?) excellent individual initiative and because of thousands of years of social evolution that created an infrastructure that supports a specific form of liberty, achievement and creativity called "free market capitalism". All of that is cultural stuff, established through various struggles against the concentration of wealth, power and control of ideas and limits on use of "public space" to assert the democratization of society. Without such democratization, your "pursuit of happiness" in the economic sphere would be much less about LIBERTY than about you supporting the RULING ELITE.

re: http://www.phillysoc.org/liggiosa.htm

 | THE HISPANIC TRADITION OF LIBERTY:
 | THE ROAD NOT TAKEN IN LATIN AMERICA
 | Professor Leonard P. Liggio
 | Mont Pelerin Society Regional Meeting
 | Antigua, Guatemala
 | January 12, 1990
 | Atlas Economic Research Foundation

In the above article, Dr. Leonard Liggio explains that in the 500 years before Columbus left europe, "democratic" alternatives to feudalism existed, including in the gothic (germanic/norse) kingdoms in the north of Spain/Espana (the "pagan" goths invaded western europe as the roman empire crumbled). Such "democratic" forms of social organization were supported by *decentralized* and *reformist* traditions within the catholic church (supportive of the movements that encouraged *independent* literacy and small business). Some of that inheritance was connected to norse traditions of decentralized government, such as that Viking landowners could ignore a King that attempted to overtax the people.

Overtaxation was always associated with not LIBERTY, but EMPIRE, WAR, and SLAVERY (as well as other forms of exploitation and oppression).

So, at the point at which modernism began to emerge from feudal society, a complex mix of cultural-evolutionary forces increased two "opposing" tendencies: imperialism and liberty/democracy.

Imperialism was based on centralized power (autocratic aristocracy), and on mythic-conformist, religious values.

Liberty was based on decentralized power and scientific rationalism.

Oddly, the cultural, technological and economic changes that came about simultaneously fueled both imperialism (centralization) and democracy (decentralization). European powers surpassed their traditional rivals in the Islamic world as they developed innovative technologies and economic power (through *global* trade).

The USA has *always* been a tense mix of the two tendencies: imperialism and liberty.

*** WALL STREET PLAYED A PIVOTAL ROLE IN THE SLAVE TRADE ***

President Andrew Jackson was elected to curtail the corruption that set in when the US central bank began to systematically and ruthlessly exploit family farmers and corrupt the government.

President Abraham Lincoln had similar objectives: protection of small businesses and family farms.

The industrial revolution "rigged" and tilted the system back toward big businesses, such as mines, factories, timber corporations, railroads, oil companies, etc., but ESPECIALLY BIG BANKS.

Several generations of LABOR ACTIVISM (really a low level civil war) was necessary to bring some small measure of "balance" back to a system otherwise RIGGED toward CENTRALIZED POWER and CORRUPT GOVERNMENT. That balance was achieved by FDR in the "New Deal" just before WWII.

It left the "Man Behind the curtain" in place, but forced the corporate plutocrats to give their "opposition" (labor, leftists, liberals, progressives) a small amount of power within the democratic institutions.

If you read the original "Wizard of Oz", you will realize that it is a critique of the "rigged" system of State Capitalism (Corporatism) that VAPORIZED middle class wealth over and over in cyclical economic bubbles, including the Great Depression (1930s).

The "New Deal" was undone starting in the 1960s as opposition to the plutocrats first became discredited by its association with radical postmodernism. By the 80s, Ronald Reagan was able to "brainwash" people by associating the worse aspects of IMPERIALISM with "PATRIOTISM".

According to "Reaganomics", it was "patriotic" to exploit poor people, to engage in stupid wars that only enriched a small number of WEAPONS CORPORATIONS and OIL COMPANIES, and to CORRUPT MEDICINE with overwhelming greed.

An "evolutionary ratchet" began that allowed the ultrawealthy to move their corporate/bank profits into OFFSHORE/ZERO TAX accounts and for their banks to BUY POLITICIANS who would ensure that NO BANK REFORMS could be put in place (many warnings about the need for bank reforms were "ignored").

Mass media corporations played their role, indoctrinating traditionalists ad conservatives into INSANE ideologies that worked against the interests of working people and small/family businesses!

Meanwhile, large multinational corporations have thrived and are running large profits, now doing MORE BUSINESS OUTSIDE THE USA THAN INSIDE.

Both political parties got in on the game, Bill Clinton "sold out" the liberal-progressive movement in order to get in bed with the wealthy people that put him in power.

So, meaningful reforms will involve a paradigm shift away from all of the above insanity and brainwashing.

From my 25+ years of research, the best possibility of such reform is in the transpartisan and holistic/integral consciousness movements.

What Jesse and other progressive "1%" people understand is that the best hope for the future of LIBERTY and DEMOCRACY is in supporting ideas and groups that advance integral/holistic and transpartisan values.

Those values will not be supported by most of the people in the existing IMPERIALISTIC social institutions that want to "hold onto" their power and greed.

What history clearly reveals is that it is only under real threat of mass social chaos, disorder and SUSTAINED OPPOSITION BY WORKING PEOPLE that the IMPERIALISTS and PLUTOCRATS will "compromise" and allow democracy and progress.

Every single successful social justice movement in history required the support of small, family businesses to survive.

Now is the time for you to make the wise choice and the right choice.

HTH!

Why don't the 1% supporting the 99% write checks

Posted by Francisco at Nov 20, 2011 02:17 PM
Oh, one more thing, for the 1% Rich who are supporting this movement and meets with the reps from the Gov't to say, "Tax us more." Isn't there a box in our tax form that let's us do just that.....give more of our income to the federal government. Just do it! Or, go to Washington DC with a check and hand it to the clerk and say, "No strings attached, and I won't take a tax deduction for this money, I want the US government to have this to help pay the debt, entitlements and programs and salaries and whatever you choose to do with it. I trust you." Now, that would be something....

Wash. D.C. - An imperial city?

Posted by Fubar at Dec 03, 2011 12:36 PM
The 1% progressives should support democracy, liberty, freedom, local values, and family businesses. that is not the same as supporting conventional politics (state capitalism). Washington D.C. has 16,000, mostly corporate, lobbyists.

Big Oil, Big Banks, Big Ag., Big Defense, all have many, many people protecting their power within the "government" system and both main political parties.

No "imperialistic" agenda should be supported.

Family businesses right now are HIGHLY dependent on a complex global system of corporate structures and decision making organizations.

It is only by supporting SMART DEMOCRACY that greater and more fair access to that system will become available to family businesses and their workers and investors.

People Who Love YES! Find Out Why... Subscribe Today

Personal tools